Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4056 Cal
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2022
12
sandip
Ct. 18
07.07.2022
C.O. No. 1588 of 2022
Sri Gobinda Chandra Nandy
Vs.
Sri Gour Chandra Nandy & Ors.
Mr. Tanmoy Mukherjee,
Mr. Souvik Das,
Mr. K. Raihan Ahmed ... For the petitioner.
The order proposed to be passed in the present
application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India
would not cause any prejudice to the opposite parties, as
such, service of notice of the present application upon the
said opposite parties is dispensed with.
The petitioner of the present application under Article
227 of the Constitution of India filed a suit in the year 2006
for eviction of the opposite parties from the suit property on
the ground that they are licensees therein, the said suit
was ultimately dismissed in the year 2016.
The plaintiff aggrieved by the judgment and decree
dismissing the suit, preferred an appeal being Title Appeal
No. 128 of 2016 pending before the 4 th Court of learned
Additional District Judge at Howrah.
The plaintiff is complaining inordinate delay in disposal
of the said appeal and is praying a direction upon the
appeal Court below for expeditious disposal of the said
appeal and the pending applications thereto.
It appears from the record that the said appeal was fixed
for hearing on August 08, 2018 but further proceeding of it
has been arrested due to the pendency of the application
filed by the respondents seeking amendment of their
written statement and two applications ancillary thereto.
Notwithstanding disruption of the normal functioning of
the Courts due to intervention of the Covid-19 pandemic,
pendency of such nature of applications for such long time
is not appreciated.
The record further reveals that July 16, 2022 is the date
fixed in the appeal for hearing of the said applications.
The Appeal Court below is requested to dispose of the
said pending applications on the said date fixed, in the
event, for any unavoidable reason, the said applications
cannot be disposed of on the said date, same shall be
disposed of within a week from the said date.
The Appeal Court below is further requested that after
disposal of the said pending applications, to make all
endeavour to dispose of the said appeal as expeditiously as
possible, preferably within a period of five effective available
working months of the said Appeal Court and in doing so,
shall not entertain the prayer of the parties for any
unnecessary adjournment.
The petitioner is required to communicate this order to
the opposite parties and to the learned advocate
representing them in the Appeal Court below.
C.O. 1588 of 2022 is disposed of with the above terms
without any order as to costs.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied
for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with
all requisite formalities.
(Biswajit Basu, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!