Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4028 Cal
Judgement Date : 6 July, 2022
06.07.2022 rc/ct.no.24 Item No.ML-115 WPA No. 6392 of 2021 Ashit Kumar Pareek & Ors.
Versus Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.
Mr. Chayan Gupta
Mr. Rittick Chowdhury
Mr. Ashutosh Singh
Mr. Deepankar Thakur ...for the Petitioners
Mr. Alok Kumar Ghosh
Mrs. Era Ghose ...for the KMC
Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on
record.
The petitioners are aggrieved by the incorporation
of the premises no. 2B, Ram Kamal Street, Kolkata 700
023 as Grade-IIA Heritage Building.
It has been submitted by the learned counsel
appearing on behalf of the petitioners that no prior
notice was issued in favour of the owner of the property
before including the building in the list of heritage
buildings.
The petitioners have filed representation before the
Kolkata Municipal Corporation (in brevity, "KMC") in
February, 2021 and allege that the same has not been
taken up for consideration till date.
Learned counsel relies upon judgments of this
Court where the action of the KMC to include buildings
in the heritage list without giving prior intimation to the
owner has been set aside by the Court.
The petitioner prays for a direction upon the KMC
to delete the building in question from the list of heritage
buildings.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the KMC
seeks time to file affidavit in the matter.
In view of the above, let affidavit-in-opposition be
filed within six weeks from date. Affidavit-in-reply, if any,
be filed within fortnight thereafter.
The writ petition shall be treated as ready for
hearing after completion of affidavits.
Urgent certified website copy of this order, if
applied for, be furnished to the parties upon compliance
of necessary formalities.
(Amrita Sinha,J)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!