Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Commodity Culture Pte Ltd vs M. T. Sea Gull 9 (Imo No. 9175092)
2022 Latest Caselaw 1979 Cal/2

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1979 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 18 July, 2022

Calcutta High Court
Commodity Culture Pte Ltd vs M. T. Sea Gull 9 (Imo No. 9175092) on 18 July, 2022
CD-7

                       IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                             Admiralty Jurisdiction
                                ORIGINAL SIDE

                                IA NO. GA/1/2022
                                   In T/26/2022

                       COMMODITY CULTURE PTE LTD.
                                      Vs
                      M. T. SEA GULL 9 (IMO NO. 9175092)


BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR

Date : 18th July, 2022.

Appearance:

Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury, Adv.

Mr. Ratul Das, Adv.

Mr. Dwip Raj Basu, Adv.

...for the plaintiff

Mr. Saunak Mitra, Adv.

Mr. Pabitra Dutta, Adv.

Mr. Souvik Kundu, Adv.

Mr. Pranit Bag, Adv.

Mr. Santosh Kr. Roy, Adv.

Ms. Sannoyee Chakravorty, Adv.

...for the KoPT

The Court:- By an order dated 7 th July, 2022 this Court had ordered arrest

in respect of the defendant vessel.

By the said order, the defendant was also granted liberty to deposit a sum

of USD 6,33,250/- as security with the Registrar, Original Side of this Court in

order to enable the subject vessel to sail. By an order dated 8 th July, 2022, (due

to an inadvertent accidental omission) the figure of USD 6,33,950 was modified

to USD 9,35,000.

Thereafter, the matter had appeared on 14 th July, 2022 when the

Advocates for the defendant vessel had pointed out that there was an issue in

respect of furnishing security in US Dollars before the Registrar, High Court. By

the order dated 14th July, 2022, primarily on the ground that the vessel had

been arrested, this Court had permitted the defendant vessel to put in the

security in the form of Indian Currency i.e., Rs.7,38,19,092/- which had also

been pleaded in paragraph 29 of the Affidavit in support.

It is submitted on behalf of the defendant vessel that a bank draft for an

equivalent amount of Rs.7,38,19,092/- has been prepared. The same is handed

over to the Marshal in Court for deposit with the Registrar, Original Side who is

directed to put in the same in an interest bearing account with a nationalized

bank forthwith.

It is submitted by Mr. Chowdhury appearing on behalf of the plaintiff that

there is a risk of the plaintiff being deprived in view of any currency fluctuation

from date till the time the final decree is passed.

Mr. Chowdhury fairly submits that the Advocates appearing on behalf of

the defendant vessel should take necessary instructions for replacing the

amount in Indian Currency with a bank guarantee in US Dollars by way of a

suitable instrument. He also relies on an unreported judgment of the Bombay

High Court dated 12th November, 1992 in Admiralty Suit No. 22 of 1992.

In my view, the claim of the plaintiff ought to have been more

appropriately secured in US Dollars. In view of the aforesaid, the Advocates

appearing on behalf of the defendant vessel are directed to take necessary

instructions to replace the amount lying with the Registrar, Original Side in

terms of this order with a suitable bank guarantee in US Dollars or any other

form of security whereby the plaintiff's claim can be secured in US Dollars.

A direction is also issued on the Registrar, Original Side to take necessary

steps forthwith for opening of a FCNB Account or any appropriate account

wherein deposits and payments may be made in US Dollars to be maintained by

this Court.

This order is passed without prejudice to the rights of the defendant vessel

that the suit is not maintainable and without admitting any liability in respect of

the claim of the plaintiff.

In view of the compliance with the order dated 7 th July, 2022 the Marshall

is directed to intimate all necessary parties statutory and otherwise that the

vessel be released. Such communication by the Marshall is permitted by way of

fax or e-mail.

Liberty is also granted to the Advocate on behalf of the parties to

communicate this order to all concerned authorities who are directed to act on

the basis of the same.

The KOPT is represented.

It is needless to mention that all the legitimate dues of the KOPT shall be

paid by the defendant vessel in accordance with law.

Let this matter appear on 25 July, 2022.

The Affidavit of Competency filed on behalf of the defendant be kept with

the records. The defendant is granted leave to file Vakalatnama in the

Department.

(RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.)

TO

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter