Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajesh @ Daya Ramesh Chauhan And ... vs State Of Maharashtra
2023 Latest Caselaw 5389 Bom

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5389 Bom
Judgement Date : 9 June, 2023

Bombay High Court
Rajesh @ Daya Ramesh Chauhan And ... vs State Of Maharashtra on 9 June, 2023
Bench: Prakash Deu Naik
2023:BHC-AS:15378

                 DAE                                                        39-IA-1195-2023.doc

                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1195 OF 2023
                                                    IN
                                     CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 370 OF 2023

            1. Rajesh @ Daya Ramesh Chauhan
            2. Jatashankar Dinanath Pandey                          ... Applicants
                   Versus
            The State Of Maharashtra                                ...Respondent

                                                     ....
            Mr. Ravi Dwivedi Advocate for Applicants.
            Mr. Y. M. Nakhwa, APP for the Respondent - State.
            PSI. Sawant D.C.B. CID Unit XI. is present.

                                                     ....

                                                    CORAM : PRAKASH D.NAIK, J.
                                                      DATE :   9th JUNE, 2023.
            P.C.:-

            1.        This is an application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail

            during the pendency of Criminal Appeal preferred by the applicant

            challenging the judgment and order dated 13 th February 2023 passed by

            learned Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai convicting the

            Applicants for offences punishable under Sections 399 and 402 of Indian

            Penal Code. On both the counts, applicants are sentenced to suffer rigorous

            imprisonment of fine years which are directed to run concurrently.

            2.        Learned Advocate for the Applicants submitted that, the applicant

            No.1 is in custody for a period of two years whereas the Applicant No.2 is in

                                                                                                    1/3



                     ::: Uploaded on - 12/06/2023                  ::: Downloaded on - 13/06/2023 03:13:30 :::
       DAE                                                   39-IA-1195-2023.doc

custody for a period of three years. The prosecution case suffers from

serious infirmities. The applicants were arrested on suspicion. The person

who was to be allegedly robbed by the accused could not be traced. The

appeal may not come up for hearing immediately.

3.      Learned APP submitted that, the offence is of serious nature. Reliance

is placed on the affidavit-in-reply filed by Investigating Officer and it is

contended that, there are criminal antecedents against both the applicants

which includes the case registered for offence under Section 302 of I.P.C.

4.      In rejoinder, learned Advocate for the applicants submitted that, in

case relating to the offence under Sections 302, 307 of I.P.C. registered with

Mira Road Police Station vide C.R. No.153 of 2015, the applicant was

granted bail by this Court vide order dated 25 th April 2017. Reliance is

placed on the copy of order passed by this Court. It is submitted that, all the

antecedents referred to in the affidavit-in-reply filed by prosecution are the

incidents which had occurred prior to registration of the present crime.

5.      It is pertinent to note that, the sentence of imprisonment is of five

years out of which the applicants have undergone imprisonment of two

years and three years respectively. Appeal may not be heard expeditiously.

Considering all the aforesaid circumstances, sentence of imprisonment can

be suspended.

                                      ORDER

(i) Interim Application No. 1195 of 2023 is allowed.

        DAE                                                   39-IA-1195-2023.doc

(ii)     The substantive sentence of imprisonment imposed vide judgment

and order dated 13th February 2023 passed by the Additional Sessions

Judge, Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.120 of 2016 is suspended and

the applicants are directed to be released on bail on executing PR bond in

the sum of Rs.25,000/- each with one or more sureties in the like amount.

(iii) The applicants shall report concerned police station once in six

months on first Saturday of the month between 11.00 am to 01.00 p.m. till

final disposal of the Appeal.

(iv) Interim Application stands disposed off.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter