Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11910 Bom
Judgement Date : 21 November, 2022
49-appln-1534-2022.odt
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1534 OF 2022
IN REVN/147/2022
SANDIP RATAN PATIL
VERSUS
BHAGYASHREE W/O SANDIP PATIL AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Patil Ujwal Subhash
APP for Respondent/State : Mr. V.M. Kagne
Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Mr. Anup D. Mane h/f Mr. Amol
S. Sawant
...
CORAM : S.G. MEHARE, J.
DATED : 21st NOVEMBER, 2022
PER COURT:-
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned
counsel for the respondents.
2. The applicant has preferred this revision against the
order granting maintenance passed by the learned Judge, Family
Court, Dhule.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the
learned Judge, Family Court did not consider whether the notice was
properly served or not. That is the sole ground challenging the
impugned order and seeking exparte stay.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents has vehemently
argued that the notice was correctly served on the proper address.
The quantum determined by the learned Judge, Family Court is also
::: Uploaded on - 21/11/2022 ::: Downloaded on - 23/11/2022 01:50:28 :::
49-appln-1534-2022.odt
(2)
correct and proper. The applicant was in arrears of Rs.2,50,000/-.
The non-applicant has to file the execution proceedings and
thereafter, the applicant approached this Court. The impugned
judgment and order was passed in the year 2021. The applicant did
not pay a single penny towards the maintenance to the respondents.
Even today, the maintenance of Rs.2 lacs is in arrears. The applicant
is not paying the maintenance regularly. Hence, the interim stay may
not be granted.
5. Perused the papers. The learned Judge, Family Court had
granted Rs.6,000/- per month to the wife and Rs.4,000/- per month
to the daughter. The counsel appearing for the applicant did not
deny that the applicant is in arrears of Rs.2 lacs on date. He is
arguing again and again that an opportunity should be granted to the
applicant to cross-examine the witnesses. Whether his absence was
genuine or beyond his control, has to be examined on merit. Till then,
the applicant cannot absolve from responding to his responsibility to
maintain his wife and daughter. The applicant's counsel would
submit that the applicant is getting Rs.15,000/- per month. In view of
the fact, the interim protection may be granted on certain conditions.
Hence, the following order :
ORDER
I) The application is allowed.
49-appln-1534-2022.odt
II) The impugned order dated 22.09.2021 passed by the learned
Judge, Family Court, Dhule in Petition No.E-66/2020 granting
maintenance to the respondents is stayed till the conclusion of present
petition, on the condition that the applicant shall deposit
Rs.1,50,000/- towards arrears of maintenance in three equal
installments of one month each from today and continue to pay
Rs.4,000/- per month to the respondent-wife and Rs.3,000/- per
month to the daughter.
III) If the applicant would fail to pay the maintenance as directed
above, the stay shall stand automatically vacated.
IV) List the revision application on 16.12.2022. Call record and
proceedings.
(S.G. MEHARE, J.)
Mujaheed//
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!