Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Deepshika Deepak Kharat And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr
2022 Latest Caselaw 4380 Bom

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4380 Bom
Judgement Date : 26 April, 2022

Bombay High Court
Deepshika Deepak Kharat And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 26 April, 2022
Bench: Prakash Deu Naik
                                                                                           17-APEAL-1018-2019.doc


                                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                  CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1018 OF 2019

                              Deepshika Deepak Kharat And Anr.                           ...Appellants
                                    Versus
                              The State Of Maharashtra And Anr.                          ...Respondents
                                                              ....
                              Mr. Ramesh Aamamurthy i/by Mr. Saikumar Ramamurthy, Advocate for
                              the Appellants
                              Mr. J. S. Kini a/w Ms. Shweta K. Jain i/by Ms. Sapna Krishnappa,
                              Advocate for Respondent No.2.
                              Mr. S. V. Gavand, APP for the Respondent - State.


                                                       CORAM         :        PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
                                                       DATE          :        26th APRIL, 2022.

                              PER COURT:

1. This is an appeal preferred under Section 372 of Code of Criminal Procedure challenging the judgment of acquittal by order dated 12th March, 2019 passed by Special Judge under POCSO Act, Greater Bombay wherein the respondent No.2 has been acquitted for offence under Section 354-A of IPC and Section 8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

2. Heard both sides.

3. Arguable questions are raised.

4. Admit.

5. Action under Section 390 of Cr.P.C. is dispensed with, since the respondent No.2 is represented by the Advocate.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) Digitally signed by SAJAKALI SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR LIYAKAT Date: Sajakali Jamadar 1 of 1 JAMADAR 2022.04.28 13:15:27 +0530

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter