Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 37223 ALL
Judgement Date : 12 November, 2024
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH ?Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:74607 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 452 of 2024 Petitioner :- Virendra Kumar Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Edu. Lko And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
Heard Shri Alok Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Shri Pradeep Kumar Pandey, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent nos. 1 to 5.
Despite the notice having been issued to respondent no. 6, nobody has responded on his behalf. As per the Office Report dated 06.03.2024, the service of notice is deemed sufficient upon the respondent no. 6. Thus, this Court proceeds to hear and decide the matter finally.
There is a consensus at the bar that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the judgement and order of this Court passed in a bunch of writ petitions leading being Writ - A No. 8517 of 2023 in re: Tirthraj Vs. State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Secondary Education Lko. And 4 Others decided on 17.05.2024 (Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:36779).
Considering the aforesaid consensus, the writ petition is allowed.
It is provided that the petitioner in this writ petition would be entitled to the benefit of the judgment passed in the case of Tirthraj (Supra).
Order Date :- 12.11.2024
Mohit Singh/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!