Allahabad High Court
Ramu Singh And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 28 March, 2023
Bench: Samit Gopal
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 71
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10258 of 2023
Applicant :- Ramu Singh And Another
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Kumar Singh,Dharmendra Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
List revised.
Heard Sri Vivek Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri B.B. Upadhyay, learned State counsel and perused the record.
This application under Section 482 has been filed by the applicants-Ramu Singh and Chhavi Rani with the prayer to quash the impugned charge sheet dated 6.7.2021 and cognizance/summoning order dated 12.11.2021 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.10860/9 of 2021 (State Vs. Ramu Singh and others) arising out of Case Crime No.970 of 2020 u/s 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Banda pending in the court of C.J.M, Banda and further to stay the further proceedings of aforesaid case.
Learned counsel for the applicants argued that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is argued that the entire allegations as levelled against the applicants are false and concocted. It is argued that charge sheet in the present matter has been submitted without any cogent evidence. The concerned trial court has passed summoning order on 12.11.2021 which is annexure no.4 to the affidavit which is on a printed proforma by filling up the name of the applicant and other details with ink which shows that there is total non application of mind. It is argued that no offence is made out against the applicant.
Per contra, learned counsel for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for quashing.
Time and again, it has been held that orders of printed proforma cannot be passed and the said system of passing such orders have been deprecated. The summoning order dated 12.11.2021 passed in the present matter is on a cyclostyled proforma in which the details have been filled with ink.
In the case of Amit Jani vs. State of U.P. and others: (2020) 5 ADJ 1, a Division Bench of this Court has held as follows:-
"The passing of orders in printed proforma/cyclostyled formats have been deprecated by various High Courts including this court as they do not reflect application of mind. Reference is made to the following judgments:-
1. 2000 ILR (Kar) 4773, Vijaya Bank Vs. State.
2. 2010(9) ADJ 594, Abdul Rasheed Vs. State of U.P. & another.
3. 2009 (67) ACC 532, Ankit Vs. State of U.P. & another.
4. 2010 (3) ADJ 622, Saurabh Dewana Vs. State of U.P."
Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and without going into the merits of the case as of now, the summoning order dated 12.11.2021 is hereby set aside.
The present application is allowed to this extent.
The matter is remanded back to the trial court to pass fresh order in accordance with law within three weeks from today.
(Samit Gopal, J.)
Order Date :- 28.3.2023
Gaurav
