Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Sifat Fatima vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 35857 ALL

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 35857 ALL
Judgement Date : 19 December, 2023

Allahabad High Court

Smt. Sifat Fatima vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of ... on 19 December, 2023

Author: Karunesh Singh Pawar

Bench: Karunesh Singh Pawar





HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
 
 


?Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:83970
 
Court No. - 13
 
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6350 of 2023
 
Petitioner :- Smt. Sifat Fatima
 
Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 2 Others
 
Counsel for Petitioner :- Syed Azizul Hasan Rizvi
 
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
 

 
Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
 

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

Notices to respondent no. 3 are dispensed with in view of the proposed order.

By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief:-

Issue an order or direction, directing opposite party no. 2 to dispose of the pending Session Trial No. 10 of 2023 "State Vs. Mohammad Imran" pending in the Court of 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge, Balrampur, quickly, and expeditiously within two months, in the interest of justice.

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the petition submitting that it is a new trial and no undue preference should be given to this trial over the old trial(s) in view of the judgment of Supreme Court passed in the case of M. Gopalakrishnan and others Vs. Pasumpon Muthuramalingam and another, Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Diary No. 30839/2021.

Hon'ble Supreme Court vide judgment dated 11.03.2022 in the case of M. Gopalakrishnan and others Vs. Pasumpon Muthuramalingam and another, Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Diary No. 30839/2021, has held that undue preference should not be given to the new trials while expediting the proceedings over the old trial.

On due consideration to the submissions advanced as well as perusal of the record, and also the judgment of the Supreme Court passed in the case of M. Gopalakrishnan (supra), I am of the view that no undue preference can be given to this trial over the pending old trials and the trial of the aforesaid case cannot be expedited.

However, learned trial court is directed not to give any undue adjournment to the parties.

The petition, being devoid of merit, is dismissed.

Order Date :- 19.12.2023/R.C.

 

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter