Allahabad High Court
Tikam Singh Tyagi vs State Of U.P. on 12 December, 2023
Author: Siddharth
Bench: Siddharth
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:235404
Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 51710 of 2023
Applicant :- Tikam Singh Tyagi
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Virendra Singh Tomar,Rajiv Sisodia
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ajay Tripathi,Akash Tyagi
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Despite time granted to the learned counsel for the informant, no counter affidavit has been filed.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
There is allegation in the first information report that on 22.09.2023 the applicant met the victim on tea stall. Thereafter she took tea with him and the applicant took her to the house of a friend for getting her medicine and committed the alleged offence of rape.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is aged about 75 years and he has civil dispute with his nephew, Tillu @ Yogesh Tyagi. Victim has implicated the applicant at the behest of Tillu @ Yogesh Tyagi. First information report no.0456 of 2022 was lodged on 21.09.2022 by the applicant against, Yogesh Tyagi @ Tillu and his son Ankit Tyagi under Section 420, 447, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C which has been brought on record by way of annexure no.7 to the bail application to a prove the enmity of applicant with his nephew, Yogesh Tyagi @ Tillu. In her statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C victim has admitted knowing Tillu Tyagi since he had got her electricity bill settled. She has admitted making phone calls about twice a day to aforesaid Tillu @ Yogesh Tyagi. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that it is a case of malicious prosecution of the applicant by his nephew though the victim who is major and married woman. He is in jail since 08.11.2023.
Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the above submissions.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused; submissions of the learned counsel for the parties noted above; finding force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant; keeping view the uncertainty regarding conclusion of trial; one sided investigation by police, ignoring the case of accused side; applicant being under trial having fundamental right to speedy trial; larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and recent judgment dated 11.07.2022 of the Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. C.B.I., passed in S.L.P (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021 and considering 5-6 times overcrowding in jails over and above their capacity by the under trials and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant, Tikam Singh Tyagi, involved in Case Crime No.973 of 2023, under Sections 376 I.P.C, Police Station Kotwali, District- Bijnor be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.
(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.
(ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(iii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or as directed by the Court. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) In case the applicant misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation then the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(v) The applicant shall remain present in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the complainant is free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this court.
Identity and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 12.12.2023
SS
