Allahabad High Court
Mohd. Imran vs State Of U.P Through Secretary Home And ... on 2 December, 2023
Author: Neeraj Tiwari
Bench: Neeraj Tiwari
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:228695
Court No. - 87
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6446 of 2022
Applicant :- Mohd. Imran
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Through Secretary Home And Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Samiuzzaman Khan
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. By this application learned counsel for the applicant has prayed to set aside the impugned judgment and order dated 02.09.2021 as well as 08.10.2021 passed in Case Crime No. 1006 of 2020(State Vs. Vivek and others), under Section 5Ka/8, 5Kha/8 of Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 and Section 11Gha of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, Police Station-Naubasta, District-Kanpur Nagar and pass order to release the vehicle No. U.P. 79 T 4518.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that applicant is owner of the vehicle in question and no useful purpose would be served in keeping the vehicle at police station which would result in the vehicle becoming junk. Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon a decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Sunder Bhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat 2003 (46) A.C.C. 223 in support of his contention, in which it has been held that it is not desirable in the matter of motor vehicle, the vehicle be kept at the police station for a long time which result in the vehicle becoming junk, therefore, the vehicle-in-question should be released in favour of the registered owner on such terms and conditions as the court below may deem fit and proper. Relevant paragraphs of the said judgment is being quoted below;
" Learned senior counsel Mr. Dholakia, appearing for the State of Gujarat further submitted that at present in the police station premises, number of vehicles are kept unattended and vehicles become junk day by day. It is his contention that appropriate directions should be given to the Magistrates who are dealing with such questions to hand over such vehicles to its owner or to the person from whom the said vehicles are seized by taking appropriate bond and the guarantee for the return of the said vehicles if required by the Court at any point of time.
However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that this
question of handing over vehicles to the person from whom it is seized or to its true owner is always a matter of litigation and a lot of arguments are advanced by the concerned persons.
In our view, whatever be the situation, it is of no use to keep such-seized vehicles at the police stations for a long period. It is for the Magistrate to pass appropriate orders immediately by taking appropriate bond and guarantee as well as security for return of the said vehicles, if required at any point of time. This can be done pending hearing of applications for return of such vehicles.
In case where the vehicle is not claimed by the accused, owner, or the insurance company or by third person, then such vehicle may be ordered to be auctioned by the Court. If the said vehicle is insured with the insurance company then insurance company be informed by the Court to take possession of the vehicle which is not claimed by the owner or a third person. If Insurance company fails to take possession, the vehicles may be sold as per the direction of the Court. The Court would pass such order within a period of six months from the date of production of the said vehicle before the Court. In any case, before handing over possession of such vehicles, appropriate photographs of the said vehicle should be taken and detailed panchnama should be prepared."
4. Learned counsel for the applicant has also placed reliance upon the judgments of this Court reported in 2007(1) JIC (All.), Ramesh Chandra Shukla Vs. State of U.P. & another and 2012 (77) ACC 381 Shyam Singh Kushwaha Vs. State of U.P. and another in support of his contention.
5. After hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A., and after perusing the order impugned as well as averments made in the present application, this Court is of the opinion, that the arguments as raised by learned counsel for the applicant has substance.
6. Accordingly, the impugned orders dated 02.09.2021 passed by the Police Commissioner Kanpur Nagar and 08.10.2021 passed by Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 3rd, Kanpur Nagar are hereby set aside with the liberty to the applicant to file an appropriate application alongwith all relevant documents showing the ownership of the vehicle, before Police Commissioner Kanpur Nagar. If such an application is filed within one month from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of as expeditiously as possible, strictly in accordance with law as well as in terms of judgment and order passed by the Apex Court in the matter of Sunder Bhai Ambalal Desai (supra) maximum within a period of one month, thereafter, in case auction proceeding of the vehicle in question has not been completed in compliance of order dated 25.01.2023.
7. With the aforesaid directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed.
Order Date :- 2.12.2023
ADY
