Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 13036 ALL
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD ?Court No. - 84 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1274 of 2014 Revisionist :- Smt. Gargi And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Revisionist :- Uday Narayan Khare Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Santosh Shukla Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
1. None appeared to press this revision even in revised call. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. This criminal revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. has been filed aggrieved by order and judgment dated 24.03.2014 passed by Family Court, Auraiya in Complaint Case No. 212 of 2017 (Smt. Gargi and others Vs. Yogesh Kumar) under Section 125 Cr.P.C. whereby, the application filed by revisionists under Section 125 Cr.P.C. before the Family Court has been rejected.
3. Having gone through the record, I do not find any manifest error or otherwise illegality, procedural or otherwise, so as to justify interference in criminal revision.
4. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
5. Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Order Date :- 14.9.2022
Nirmal Sinha
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!