The Kerala High Court has taken a significant step towards ensuring the well-being and rights of intersex children by directing the government to establish a State Level Multidisciplinary Committee composed of experts.
The committee, which will include a Pediatrician/Pediatric Endocrinologist, Pediatric Surgeon, and Child Psychiatrist/Child Psychologist, will be tasked with reviewing requests for sex-selective surgeries on intersex children.
Justice V.G. Arun, presiding over a single judge bench, also urged the government to issue regulations governing sex-selective surgeries on infants and children within three months. Until such regulations are in place, the court stipulated that such surgeries should only proceed based on the recommendation of the State Level Multidisciplinary Committee and when deemed essential to save the child's life.
The court's decision stemmed from a case brought by parents seeking permission to conduct genital reconstructive surgery on their 7-year-old child, who was born with ambiguous genitalia. The child had been diagnosed with 'Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia' and was undergoing treatment. The parents contended that the surgery was necessary to avoid potential social ostracization and psychological trauma for the child.
The court's ruling is significant as it navigated complex ethical and legal considerations surrounding the right of parents to make decisions about their child's gender identity. While acknowledging the parents' concerns, the court emphasized that the surgery being sought was non-consensual and required a more thorough examination.
The court delved into a detailed medico-legal discussion, distinguishing between the concepts of 'gender' and 'sex.' While the terms are often used interchangeably, the court highlighted the distinct nature of each concept. It explained that 'sex' pertains to biological characteristics, while 'gender' encompasses societal roles, behaviours, and identities associated with being male, female, or non-binary.
Justice Arun noted that the parents' request, while permissible under normal circumstances, was seeking non-consensual sex-affirmative surgery. The court expressed concern about the potential violation of the child's rights and dignity, particularly considering the child's potential development and orientation.
In response to the case, the court issued a series of directions aimed at promoting a comprehensive and thoughtful approach:
1. The formation of a State Level Multidisciplinary Committee with experts to review sex-selective surgery requests.
2. Examination of the child by the committee within two months to assess potential life-threatening situations arising from ambiguous genitalia.
3. Granting permission for surgery if the committee determines that the child's condition poses a life-threatening risk.
Source: Link
Picture Source :
