The Supreme Court of India has firmly dismissed any possibility of a Brexit-style referendum in the context of scrapping Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir. The Court emphasized that India's constitutional democracy operates through established institutions, making a direct referendum akin to the Brexit vote untenable.
This assertion was made during the proceedings of a five-judge bench, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, which is deliberating on the constitutional legality of abrogating Article 370. The Court was responding to senior advocate Kapil Sibal's comparison of the scrapping of Article 370 to the Brexit referendum, where British citizens were consulted directly.
Sibal, representing National Conference leader Mohd Akbar Lone, who has challenged the repeal of Article 370, argued that the Parliament's approval for the executive action should be evaluated in the context of whether the Union of India had the authority to take this step. He questioned the power of Parliament to revoke Article 370 without the involvement of the constituent assembly of Jammu and Kashmir.
While Sibal expressed concerns about the lack of representation and voices of the people of Jammu and Kashmir, Chief Justice Chandrachud reiterated the foundational principle of India's constitutional democracy. He emphasized that seeking the opinion of the people must be channelled through established institutions. In a constitutional democracy like India's, a direct referendum similar to Brexit does not find a place.
The Court's stance underlines the significance of adhering to established democratic processes within the framework of India's Constitution. The ongoing hearing on the pleas challenging the Article 370 decision continues to explore various legal dimensions of the issue, with the Court focused on ensuring the preservation of democratic principles and the rule of law.
The case is poised to have far-reaching implications for the interpretation of constitutional provisions and the balance between executive authority and democratic representation in India's diverse socio-political landscape. The Court's verdict will not only impact the specific issue of Article 370 but also set broader precedents for the functioning of India's constitutional democracy in the years to come.
Source: Link
Picture Source :
