Saturday, 25, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
BARE ACTS

Supreme Court (SC) Judgements on Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966

Bare Act Title Category / State
Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Maharashtra State Laws
 

List of Judgements

Kukreja Construction Company & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Judgement Date : september/2024, Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 581 SC

Pune Municipal Corporation Vs. Sus Road Baner Vikas Manch and Ors.

Judgement Date : september/2024, Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 571 SC

Kazi Akiloddin Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Judgement Date : july/2024, Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 416 SC

State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. Vs. Yogendera Mohan Sengupta and Anr.

Judgement Date : january/2024, Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 30 SC

Sayunkta Sangarsh Samiti & Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Judgement Date : december/2023, Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 933 SC

Shirdi Nagar Panchayat Vs. Kishor Sharad Borawake and Ors.

Judgement Date : september/2023, Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 743 SC

Shri Nashik Panchavati Panjarpol Trust & Ors. Vs. The Chairman & Anr

Judgement Date : august/2023, Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 652 SC

Laxmikant Vs. State of Maharashtra

Judgement Date : march/2022, Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 250 SC

State of Rajasthan Vs. Ashok Khetoliya

Judgement Date : march/2022, Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 213 SC

The Kolhapur Municipal Corporation Vs. Vasant Mahadev Patil (D) through LRS.

Judgement Date : february/2022, Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 150 SC

HARI KRISHNA MANDIR TRUST vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Judgement Date : august/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 445 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALProperty Rights - While the right to property is no longer classified as a fundamental right, it remains a constitutional and human right.CRUCIALWrit Mandamus - Court\'s Obligation - If a Government or public authority fails to properly exercise the discretion granted to it by law, the High C...

DIRECTOR GENERAL (ROAD DEVELOPMENT) NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA vs.AAM AADMI LOKMANCH

Judgement Date : july/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 420 SC

Headnote :

CRUCIALFatalities due to negligence and illegal mining along the National Highway - The National Green Tribunal has the authority to mandate compensation payments to the NHAI, even if there are no legal representatives or heirs of the deceased involved in the proceedings, or if they have pursued sep...

VINODCHANDRA SAKARLAL KAPADIA vs. STATE OF GUJARAT

Judgement Date : june/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 394 SC

Headnote :

IMPORTANTAgricultural land governed by the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act cannot be transferred through a will.According to Sections 43 and 63 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, the validity of testamentary transfers of agricultural land is in question. Even though a...

MAYOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION vs. GOVIND BAJIRAO NAVPUTE AND ORS.

Judgement Date : april/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 316 SC

Headnote :

The Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act of 1966, specifically Sections 25 and 26(1), was the basis for a petition challenging the draft development plan notified by the Municipal Corporation of Aurangabad on February 4, 2016. The petitioners argued that the plan was not created in compliance...

MOHANDAS vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Judgement Date : january/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 93 SC

Headnote :

The Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act of 1966, Section 127, addresses land reservation and the consequences of failing to acquire reserved land. In this case, the entire property owned by the appellants was designated for the development of a shopping complex and vegetable market as per the...

SHREE RAM URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Judgement Date : october/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 1039 SC

Headnote :

A. Under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, specifically Sections 51 and 354A, and the Development Control Regulations for Greater Bombay, 1991, Regulation 6.4, it is mandated that upon reaching the plinth level of construction, the Commissioner must be notified. This notification...

BALAJI ASSOCIATES THROUGH ITS PARTNERS vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Judgement Date : august/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 782 SC

Headnote :

The Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act of 1966, Section 127, addresses the reservation of land and its potential lapse. According to the final development plan for the city, the appellant\'s land was designated for a shopping center and a garden. The law requires that if the landowner wishes...

Sampada Yogesh Waghdhare Vs. State of Maharashtra

Judgement Date : april/2019, Citation : 2019 Latest Caselaw 406 SC

Janhit Manch through its President Bhagvanji Raiyani Vs. State of Maharashtra

Judgement Date : december/2018, Citation : 2018 Latest Caselaw 936 SC

Prafulla C. Dave & Ors. Vs. Municipal Commissioner & Ors. [December 03, 2014]

Judgement Date : december/2014, Citation : 2014 Latest Caselaw 753 SC

Jitu Patnaik Vs. Sanatan Mohakud & Ors. [March 2, 2012]

Judgement Date : march/2012, Citation : 2012 Latest Caselaw 164 SC

R.K. Mittal & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Ors.

Judgement Date : december/2011, Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 892 SC

Shri Girish Vyas & Anr. Vs. The State of Maharastra & Ors.

Judgement Date : october/2011, Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 760 SC

Mig Cricket Club Vs. Abhinav Sahakar Education Society & Ors.

Judgement Date : september/2011, Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 661 SC

Tata Motors Ltd. Vs. Talathi of Village Chikhali & Ors.

Judgement Date : july/2011, Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 473 SC

Girnar Traders Vs State of Maharashtra & Ors

Judgement Date : january/2011, Citation : 2011 Latest Caselaw 29 SC

S.N. Rao & Ors Vs. State of Maharashtra [1988] INSC 37 (9 February 1988)

Judgement Date : february/1988, Citation : 1988 Latest Caselaw 37 SC

Headnote :

A plot of land was acquired for the development of a five-star hotel. According to the approved development plan, this land was designated as part of a residential zone, while an adjacent area was marked as a green belt. When the development plan was submitted to the Municipal Corporation for the ho...

Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay A Vs. Dr. Hakimwadi Tenants Association & Ors [1987] INSC 344 (24 November 1987)

Judgement Date : november/1987, Citation : 1987 Latest Caselaw 343 SC

Headnote :

Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 stipulates that if land designated for reservation under the Act is not acquired by mutual agreement within ten years from the effective date of a final regional or development plan, or if acquisition proceedings under this Act or t...

Municipal Corporation For Greater Bombay & ANR Vs. Advance Builders (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors [1971] INSC 215 (25 August 1971)

Judgement Date : august/1971, Citation : 1971 Latest Caselaw 215 SC

Headnote :

In August 1958, the State Government approved a final town planning scheme known as The Bombay Town Planning Scheme, Santa Cruz, No. VI, which was set to take effect on January 1, 1959. This scheme included a Redistribution and Valuation Statement, accompanied by several notes. Note 11 specified tha...