The Supreme Court rejected a public interest litigation seeking to prevent the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) from being portrayed as the official Indian cricket team. The bench emphasized that the BCCI enjoys recognition and government endorsement, and that the petition amounted to “wastage of judicial time,” signaling judicial support for clarity in the representation of national sports teams.
The petition, filed by lawyer Reepak Kansal, sought to restrain Prasar Bharati, operator of Doordarshan and All India Radio, from referring to the BCCI team as “Team India” or the “Indian National Cricket Team.” Kansal argued that BCCI, as a private society, lacks official recognition as a National Sports Federation (NSF) and is not a public authority under the RTI Act.
The plea claimed such portrayal misleads the public, improperly associates the national flag with a private entity, and could contravene the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950 and the Flag Code of India, 2002. The petitioner contended that this practice could falsely convey governmental endorsement and commercial legitimacy to a private body.
The bench, led by Chief Justice Surya Kant along with Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice Vipul Pancholi, dismissed the petition, observing, “Let us have a clear identity about who will represent India. There is no issue. Petition has been filed for no reason.” The court noted that the BCCI has government support, Supreme Court supervision through previous orders, and will be governed under the newly enacted National Sports Governance Act.
The judges emphasized that speculative claims about misuse of national symbols by a government-endorsed body did not warrant judicial intervention and upheld the legitimacy of BCCI’s representation.
Picture Source :
