In a sharp check on overbroad criminal prosecutions, the Karnataka High Court quashed criminal proceedings against a husband’s relatives, holding that generic allegations of “instigation” or verbal abuse, without concrete details, cannot justify a trial, and warning that allowing such cases to continue would only subject parties to needless legal hardship.
The case stemmed from a complaint filed by a woman against her husband and his family members, alleging neglect and harassment. While the FIR named several relatives, the petitioners argued that the complainant herself acknowledged living separately with her husband and that her grievances were directed solely at him.
They pointed to a prior family partition and the husband’s extended stays abroad as the real source of marital discord, contending that the allegations against the wider family were sweeping, unsupported, and disconnected from any shared household or specific acts.
Justice Sachin Shankar Magadum agreed, finding the accusations against the in-laws legally untenable due to the absence of particulars. The Court noted that the complaint disclosed no dates, places, or specific conduct attributable to the relatives, and emphasised that separate residence under a family partition undermined claims of collective harassment.
Observing that refusing to intervene would expose the petitioners to avoidable prosecution, the Court stated that otherwise they “would be unnecessarily subjected to the rigmarole of criminal prosecution.” Holding that continuation of the case would amount to an abuse of process, the High Court exercised its inherent powers to quash the FIR and all pending proceedings against the petitioners.
Disclaimer: This news/ article includes information received via a syndicated news feed. The original rights remain with the respective publisher.
Picture Source :
