2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950

January February March April May June July August September October November December

Sardar Singh Vs. State (Delhi Administration, Delhi) [1993] INSC 98 (23 February 1993)

Citation : 1993 Latest Caselaw 96 SC

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)

Headnote :

The appellant, A-1, along with his wife A-2 and his brother\'s wife A-3, faced prosecution under Sections 302/34 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The entire case relied on circumstantial evidence, which included:(a) the deceased had illicit relationships with A-2 and A-3;(b) the deceased was las...

Read full Judgement

Bhaskar Gajanan Kajrekar Vs. Administrator, Dadra And Nagar Haveli & Ors [1993] INSC 99 (23 February 1993)

Citation : 1993 Latest Caselaw 97 SC

Headnote :

The appellant retired in 1977 after serving for 23 years. However, he was denied a pension on the basis that he had worked in an officiating capacity throughout his service and had never been appointed to any of the positions he held on a permanent basis. The appellant contested the pension denial b...

Read full Judgement

Padmanabhan Vijaykumar Vs. State of Kerala [1993] INSC 100 (24 February 1993)

Citation : 1993 Latest Caselaw 98 SC

CrPC Section 235. Judgment of acquittal or conviction
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 34. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention
IPC Section 450. House-trespass in order to commit offence punishable with imprisonment for life

Headnote :

On May 4, 1981, around 10:30 p.m., the appellants were arrested by the police and subsequently charged in Sessions Case No. 97 of 1981 for violations of Sections 302, 452, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Read full Judgement

Ram Bilas Vs. Jagat Narain Shrivastava [1993] INSC 101 (24 February 1993)

Citation : 1993 Latest Caselaw 99 SC

Headnote :

This appeal is filed against the judgment of the Madras High Court, which addressed the question referred to it by the Revenue, ruling against the Revenue. The question referred is

Read full Judgement

Subran @ Subramanian & Ors Vs. State of Kerala [1993] INSC 102 (24 February 1993)

Citation : 1993 Latest Caselaw 100 SC

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
IPC Section 141. Unlawful assembly
IPC Section 147. Punishment for rioting
IPC Section 149. Every member of unlawful assembly guilty of offence committed in prosecution of common object
IPC Section 299. Culpable homicide
IPC Section 300. Murder
IPC Section 302. Punishment for murder
IPC Section 325. Punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt
IPC Section 326. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means
IPC Section 86. Offence requiring a particular intent of knowledge committed by one who is intoxicated

Headnote :

Six individuals were charged by the investigating agency for offenses punishable under Sections 302, 324, 323, 341, 148 in conjunction with Section 149 IPC, related to an incident that occurred on December 24, 1986, during which a person named Suku died from injuries sustained in the assault.They fa...

Read full Judgement

K.S. Viswam Iyer Vs. State Wakf Board [1993] INSC 103 (25 February 1993)

Citation : 1993 Latest Caselaw 101 SC

Limitation Act, 1963

Headnote :

This special leave appeal is brought by the defendants challenging the judgment of the Madras High Court, which allowed the second appeal and decreed the respondent\'s suit for recovery of possession of the disputed property. The contested judgment is a common ruling issued in multiple second appeal...

Read full Judgement

Chief Engineer And Secretary, Engineering Department, U.T. C Vs. Kamlesh Baboo [1993] INSC 104 (25 February 1993)

Citation : 1993 Latest Caselaw 102 SC

Headnote :

The respondent in C.A. No. 182 of 1993 began his career as a Section Officer under the appellant on March 8, 1971. He was promoted to Sub Divisional Engineer on December 29, 1976, and his confirmation came on August 13, 1985. Subsequently, he was elevated to the position of Executive Engineer (Civil...

Read full Judgement

A.P. State Electricity Board & Ors Vs. Sarada Ferro Alloys Ltd. [1993] INSC 105 (25 February 1993)

Citation : 1993 Latest Caselaw 103 SC

Headnote :

The Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board provided a 25% rebate on demand and energy charges for High Tension industries and instructed the Director of Industries to identify qualifying industries. On July 13, 1976, the State expanded this rebate to specific industries. The Board also issued an ord...

Read full Judgement

Karamchand Premchand Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat [1993] INSC 106 (25 February 1993)

Citation : 1993 Latest Caselaw 104 SC

Super Profits Tax Act, 1963

Headnote :

The appellant-assessee received a notice under Section 23A of the Income-tax Act, 1922, which it contested. Concurrently, the assessee allocated Rs. 6,52,000 in its accounts for the year ending March 31, 1956, to address any potential issues if its argument was unsuccessful. In the 1958-59 fiscal ye...

Read full Judgement

Standard Triumph Motor Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras [1993] INSC 107 (25 February 1993)

Citation : 1993 Latest Caselaw 105 SC

Headnote :

The appellant in this case is a non-resident company based in Coventry, United Kingdom. In November 1939, it entered into a collaboration agreement with an Indian company, which entitled the appellant to a royalty of 5% on all sales made by the Indian company. This royalty, after deducting Indian ta...

Read full Judgement

Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. Vs. M.R.T.P. Commissions & ANR [1993] INSC 108 (26 February 1993)

Citation : 1993 Latest Caselaw 106 SC

Headnote :

The M.R.T.P. Commission initiated an inquiry on February 10, 1987, on its own accord, claiming that the appellant was engaging in the practice of re-sale price maintenance by failing to indicate in its price list that lower prices could be charged. This was alleged to constitute restrictive trade pr...

Read full Judgement