Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Hon'Ble Alok Mahra vs Unknown
2026 Latest Caselaw 363 UK

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 363 UK
Judgement Date : 23 January, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Uttarakhand High Court

Hon'Ble Alok Mahra vs Unknown on 23 January, 2026

               Office Notes,
            reports, orders or
             proceedings or
No   Date                                   COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
              directions and
            Registrar's order
             with Signatures

                                 C-528 No. 129 of 2026
                                 Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.

Heard Mr. Ankush Singhal, learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. Vijay Khanduri, learned Brief Holder for the State and Mr. Gaurav Panwar, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4.

2. Present C-528 application is filed with the prayer to set-aside/quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 473 of 2025, State Vs. Jarnail Singh and Others, under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 191(2), 191(3), 332(c), 352 of BNS, pending in the court of learned Civil Judge (J.D.)/Judicial Magistrate, Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar, on the basis of compromise between the parties.

3. Compounding application (IA/3/2026) is also filed in the matter wherein it is prayed to compound the offence between the parties under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 191(2), 191(3), 332(c), 352 of BNS.

4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the parties have amicably settled their dispute and have entered into a compromise.

5. Parties are present before this Court and are duly identified by their respective counsel. Parties have also filed their respective affidavits stating the facts of compromise between them.

6. Learned State Counsel has formerly objected to the compounding application.

7. Hon'ble Supreme Court, in a catena of its judgments, has observed that in cases where because of the compromise arrived at between the parties, possibility of conviction is remote and bleak, the High Court may quash the criminal proceedings as continuation of the same would cause great prejudice and injustice to the accused.

8. Following the aforesaid ratio, the present compounding application is allowed. The offences between the parties are permitted to be compounded. As a result,

of 2025, State Vs. Jarnail Singh and Others, under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 191(2), 191(3), 332(c), 352 of BNS, pending in the court of learned Civil Judge (J.D.)/Judicial Magistrate, Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar, are hereby quashed qua the applicants.

9. FIR and charge-sheet filed pursuant thereto stand quashed.

10. C-528 application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

(Alok Mahra J.) 12.03.2025 Ujjwal

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter