Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ankush Gumber And Others ... vs State Of Uttarakhand
2025 Latest Caselaw 4061 UK

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4061 UK
Judgement Date : 3 September, 2025

Uttarakhand High Court

Ankush Gumber And Others ... vs State Of Uttarakhand on 3 September, 2025

Author: Alok Kumar Verma
Bench: Alok Kumar Verma
                                                 2025:UHC:7836

     IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
                AT NAINITAL
          THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

                03rd SEPTEMBER, 2025
     ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.400 of 2025

Ankush Gumber and Others                      .....Applicants

                         Versus

State of Uttarakhand                         .....Respondent

Counsel for the Applicants :      Mr. Vipul Sharma,
                                  Advocate.
Counsel for the State     :       Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Brief
                                  Holder.

Counsel for the Informant :       Mr. Pooran Singh Rawat,
                                  Advocate.

Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

This Application has been filed by the

applicants seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.

117 of 2025, registered at Police Station Kiccha, District

Udham Singh Nagar.

2. Heard Mr. Vipul Sharma, learned counsel for

the applicants, Mr. Pradeep Lohani, learned Brief Holder

for respondent and Mr. Pooran Singh Rawat, learned

counsel for the informant.

3. Mr. Pradeep Lohani, learned Brief Holder,

submitted on instructions that the charge-sheet has

been filed for the offence under Sections 115(2),

351(2), 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023,

Section 3(1)(r) and Section 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled

2025:UHC:7836 Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of

Atrocities) Act, 1989.

4. Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate, contended that

the allegations of the respondents are totally

groundless. It has not been disclosed in the First

Information Report that the informant-victim is a

member of Scheduled Castes or the Scheduled Tribes.

The said offences of the Scheduled Castes and the

Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989

are not made out. He has relied upon a judgment of

the Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Gorige Pentaiah Vs.

State of Andhra Pradesh and Others", (2008) 12

SCC 531.

5. Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate, further

submitted that applicants have no criminal

antecedents. They are permanent residents of District

Udham Singh Nagar, therefore, there is no possibility of

their absconding. Charge-sheet has already been filed,

therefore, there is no chance of tampering with the

evidence. Applicants were granted interim bail on

29.04.2025, and, the conditions of interim bail have not

been violated by them.

6. Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Brief Holder and Mr.

Pooran Singh Rawat, Advocate, have opposed the

anticipatory bail application.

2025:UHC:7836

7. Personal liberty under Article 21 of the

Constitution of India is very precious fundamental right

and it should be curtailed only when it becomes

imperative according to the peculiar facts and

circumstances of the case.

8. Having heard the submissions of learned

counsel for the parties and keeping in view of the facts

and circumstances of the case, without commenting on

the merits or demerits of the case, the present

Application, filed for anticipatory bail, is allowed and

order dated 29.04.2025, granting interim bail to the

applicants, are made absolute. It is directed that in the

event of arrest of the applicants Ankush Gumber, Sagar

Gumber, Prem Lal Gumber and Madan Lal, they shall be

released on anticipatory bail on executing a personal

bond of Rs. 30,000/- and two reliable sureties, each of

the like amount, by each one of them, to the

satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the

following conditions:-

(i) Applicants shall attend the trial court regularly and they shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment;

(ii) Applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person, acquainted with the facts of this case;

(iii) Applicants shall not leave the country without

2025:UHC:7836 the previous permission of the trial court.

9. It is made clear that if the applicants misuse

or violate any of the conditions, imposed upon them,

the prosecution agency will be free to move the Court

for cancellation of the anticipatory bail.

10. It is made clear that the facts, produced by

the parties, and the arguments of learned counsel for

the parties have been considered solely for the purpose

of deciding this anticipatory bail application.

___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.

Dt:03.09.2025 Neha

NEHA BISHT

2.5.4.20=6f1c15b6305912b3f008e9a4a8038 ee7326b08b2d0e018b01be753f014836d27, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=3D89DC33779FB9677068452 F32DE6BA960BFE64D819EE44CA9CCE487B2 FE0F92, cn=NEHA BISHT Date: 2025.09.03 19:00:59 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter