Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5713 UK
Judgement Date : 21 November, 2025
2025:UHC:10418-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR
AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY
Writ Petition (Criminal) No.1519 of 2025
21 November, 2025
Smt. Pooja Melkani & Anr. ----Petitioners
versus
State of Uttarakhand & Others ----Respondents
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Presence:-
Mr. V.K. Guglani, learned counsel for the petitioners
Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Deputy A.G. with Mr. Rakesh Joshi, learned Brief Holder
for the State
-------------------------------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT:
(per Sri G. Narendar, J.)
1. Petitioners have approached this Court for the
following relief:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.1 and 2 to provide protection to the petitioners from the Respondent no.3 and 4 so that they can live peacefully."
2. It is submitted that both the petitioners
belong to the same faith; that the petitioners developed
a liking for each other, which has ended in marriage on
11.11.2025 at Prachin Vanshakti Mandir, Pantnagar
SIDCUL, District Udham Singh Nagar, according to
Hindu rites and rituals, and now both the petitioners are
2025:UHC:10418-DB
living together. Since the family members and others
relatives of the first petitioner are against this marriage,
they are giving out threats to kill both the petitioners.
Petitioners submit that they are facing stiff resistance,
and they seriously apprehend threat to their life and
limb from the family and other relatives of the first
petitioner, and hence they are before this Court praying
for protection.
3. The documents on record reveal that both the
petitioners are majors, and it is also submitted by the
learned Deputy Advocate General for the State that the
parties have performed their marriage on 11.11.2025.
The petitioners have also placed on record marriage
photographs as well as the receipt issued by Prachin
Vanshakti Mandir, Pantnagar SIDCUL, District Udham
Singh Nagar as Annexure-1.
4. In that view of the matter, and in view of the
ruling of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata
Singh v. State of U.P. and another, (2006) 5 SCC
475, the petitioners have made out a case for grant of
protection.
2025:UHC:10418-DB
5. The Station House Officer, Police Station
Transit Camp, District Udham Singh Nagar is directed to
assess the threat, if any, to the life and limb of the
petitioners, and provide necessary protection, if it is
found that there is a threat to the life and limb of the
petitioners. The SHO is further directed to summon the
private respondents, and such other persons, who are
inimically placed towards the marriage of the
petitioners, and counsel them, in accordance with law.
6. The Writ Petition stands ordered accordingly.
7. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(G. NARENDAR, C.J.)
(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 21.11.2025 Rajni
RAJINI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=97cfa6e4cbd49c07b876db4844 8ac3701a9ae475a2547e4b7f1d9b1f17d0
GUSAIN 1342, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=8D039BC77BD1A2222B4D F4FC80D4557562F95BEBA013F530616A 158A0A878BD8, cn=RAJINI GUSAIN Date: 2025.11.21 16:13:31 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!