Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nadeem And Others ....Appellants vs State Of Uttarakhand
2025 Latest Caselaw 5190 UK

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5190 UK
Judgement Date : 1 November, 2025

Uttarakhand High Court

Nadeem And Others ....Appellants vs State Of Uttarakhand on 1 November, 2025

Author: Alok Kumar Verma
Bench: Alok Kumar Verma
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT
               NAINITAL
     THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA
     THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK MAHRA

                    01st NOVEMBER, 2025

             Second Bail Application (IA No.8650 of 2024)
                                   in
          CRIMINAL APPEAL No.663 of 2019

Nadeem and Others                                  ....Appellants

                             Versus

State of Uttarakhand                               ....Respondent


Counsel for the Appellants     :      Mr. T.A. Khan, Senior
                                      Advocate assisted by Mr.
                                      Mohd. Shafy, Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent     :      Mr. S.C. Dumka, Assistant
                                      Government Advocate.

(Per : Shri Alok Kumar Verma, J.)


            This Appeal has been filed by Nadeem, Ashif

alias Salim and Nizam alias Chotu. They have been

convicted     and sentenced for the offence punishable

under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian

Penal Code, 1860 (in short, "IPC"), Section 394 IPC and

Section 411 IPC vide judgment dated 23.10.2019 /

31.10.2019, passed by the learned Additional Sessions

Judge, Vikasnagar, District Dehradun in Sessions Trial

No.136 of 2012.

2.          The present Bail Application (IA No. 8650 of

2024) has been filed by the appellant no.2 Ashif alias

Salim.
                                  2
3.        The    First     Bail Application of the appellant

was rejected on 19.11.2020.

4.        The case of the prosecution is that three-four

unknown persons entered the house at night, beat the

informant's uncle and aunt and took away jewelery and

money. The injured were taken to hospital. His uncle

died due to injuries sustained in the said incident.

5.        Heard Mr. T.A. Khan, learned Senior Advocate

for the appellant and Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned Assistant

Government Advocate for the State.

6.        Mr.    S.C.      Dumka,          learned      Assistant

Government Advocate, has opposed the Bail Application

on the ground that the case against the appellant is

proven and he has a criminal history.

7.        Mr.   T.A.     Khan,       learned   Senior   Advocate

appearing for the present appellant Ashif alias Salim has

submitted that the appellant has been acquitted in the

Case Crime No.34 of 2008 under Section 302 IPC and

Section 120B IPC, Case Crime No.68 of 2008 under

Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, Case Crime no.388 of

2008 under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters

and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Case

Crime No 72 of 2012 under Sections 302, 394 and

Section 411 IPC, and, he is on bail in Case Crime

No.196 of 2019 under Section 3 read with Section 25 of

the Arms Act, 1959, Case Crime No.131 of 2019 under
                              3
Section 5 read with Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959,

Case Crime No.219 of 2019 under Section 2 read with

Section 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-

Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, and, Case

Crime No.904 of 2014 under Section 398 and Section

401 IPC.

8.         Mr. T.A. Khan, Senior Advocate contended

that the Test Identification Parade was not conducted

by the prosecution and as per the statement of the wife

of the deceased, the alleged injured, she was unknown

to the appellant. She stated that she had heard the

voice of the assailants but she had not recognized

them. Therefore, there is substantial doubt about the

conviction. Nizam alias Chotu, the appellant of the

similar role, has already been granted bail by this Court

on 01.10.2024. Appellant has spent more than six years

and ten months in judicial custody. The present Appeal

is pending since the year, 2019 and the appeal is not

likely to be heard within a reasonable period. Appellant

is a permanent resident of District Bijnor, Uttar Pradesh,

therefore, there is no possibility of his absconding.

9.         Having regard to the facts and circumstances

of the case and the period of incarceration suffered by

the appellant, without expressing any opinion as to the

merits or demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to
                               4
grant bail to the appellant during the pendency of this

appeal.

10.         The Second Bail Application (IA No.8650 of

2024) is allowed.

11.         Let the appellant - Ashif alias Salim be

released on bail on his executing a personal bond and

furnishing two reliable sureties of the same amount to

the satisfaction of the trial court.


                                  __________________
                                   Alok Kumar Verma, J.

____________ Alok Mahra, J. Date: 01.11.2025 Shiv/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter