Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2460 UK
Judgement Date : 21 March, 2025
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 386 of 2025 (S/S)
Smt. Sushila Negi and others ..........Petitioners
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand and others ..... Respondents
Present : Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Narain Dutt, Standing Counsel for the State of
Uttarakhand/respondent nos.1 to 4.
Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocate for respondent nos.5 and 6.
JUDGMENT
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
By means of the instant petition, the
petitioners seek the following reliefs:-
"i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondent to pay interest @ 9% per annum on delayed payment of revised pay scale w.e.f. 01-05-1995 to 30-06-2010 forthwith qua the petitioners as the respondents authorities have paid and released the said benefit of the interest upon the arrear of revised pay scale in respect to the similarly situated counterpart of the petitioners."
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and
perused the record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would
submit that the petitioners were given delayed payment,
but interest has not been paid. He would submit that the
matter is squarely covered by the judgment dated
20.12.2024, passed by this Court in WPSS No.2376 of
2024, Premwati Sharma and others vs. State of
Uttarakhand and others; and connected cases.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents admit
these facts.
5. Since, the matter is covered, instant petition is
decided in terms of the judgment dated 20.12.2024,
passed by this Court in WPSS No.2376 of 2024, Premwati
Sharma and others vs. State of Uttarakhand and others;
and connected cases.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 21.03.2025 Sanjay
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!