Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1140 UK
Judgement Date : 6 June, 2025
2025:UHC:4611-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR
AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK MAHRA
WRIT PETITION (S/B) NO. 202 OF 2025
06TH JUNE, 2025
Dr. Mukesh Lal Sah ...... Petitioner
Versus
Kumaon University, Nainital & others ...... Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Joshi, learned
counsel
Counsel for the respondents : Ms. Mamta Bisht, learned counsel for
respondent Nos. 1 to 3
: Mr. Harshvardhan Dhanik, learned
counsel for respondent No. 4
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:
(per Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sri G. Narendar)
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Anil
Kumar Joshi and the learned counsel for the respondent
University Ms. Mamta Bisht.
2) The case of the petitioner, in a nutshell, is that he is
qualified to hold the post of Professor and Associate
2025:UHC:4611-DB Professor and that the University has invited applications
for making appointments to the post of Professor and
Associate Professor. That the petitioner has been working
as Assistant Professor in the department of
Pharmaceutical Sciences, Bhimtal, Kumaon University.
That the petitioner is a Post Graduate in Pharmacy
Science.
3) On perusal of the advertisement it is seen that with
regard to eligibility it is stipulated that a candidate shall
possess a good academic record with Ph.D. degree in the
subject concerned or in a relevant discipline, and a
Master's Degree with 55% marks and minimum of eight
years of experience of teaching. From a reading of the
above, more particularly, eligibility condition no. (i), it is
apparent that recruitment is being sought for post in
various departments.
4) Be that as it may, it is the contention of the
petitioner that the eligibility criteria stipulated by the
University is in respect of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Department, the same is contrary to the eligibility criteria
as fixed by the Pharmacy Council of India, and in this
regard he has submitted a representation dated
19/20.05.2025.
2025:UHC:4611-DB
5) In view of the fact that no illegal action is complained
of but only an apprehension established before the Court,
we are of the considered opinion, that the instant writ
petition could be disposed of by directing the second
respondent University to consider the writ petition as a
representation and dispose of the same by a speaking
order as expeditiously as possible at any rate within an
outer limit of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy
of this order.
6) Registry is directed to dispatch a copy of this order
forthwith to the Respondents.
7) The writ petition stands ordered accordingly.
8) There shall be no order as to costs.
9) As a sequel thereto, pending application, if any, shall
stand closed.
________________ G. NARENDAR, C.J.
____________ ALOK MAHRA, J.
Dt: 06TH JUNE, 2025 Negi
HIMANS DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=bb3b60774012c1ef1dae20d13aa f116e73351fdaf6878326386908a7f90d575
HU NEGI 7, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=75BD9D0FB7F4A80990FC5 1A722A6BC552D470EB4FD2F88DDF7C18 DB2A1524A4D, cn=HIMANSHU NEGI Date: 2025.06.09 13:05:44 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!