Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sitab Singh vs Mahesh Chandra Nainwal
2025 Latest Caselaw 1474 UK

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1474 UK
Judgement Date : 2 January, 2025

Uttarakhand High Court

Sitab Singh vs Mahesh Chandra Nainwal on 2 January, 2025

Author: Vivek Bharti Sharma
Bench: Vivek Bharti Sharma
                                                                 2025:UHC:15



HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
            Civil Revision No. 86 of 2022
Sitab Singh                                             .........Revisionist
                                 Versus
Mahesh Chandra Nainwal                             ..........Respondent
Presence:-
Mr. Lokendra Dobhal and Mr. Pratul Kumar Advocates for the
revisionist.
Mr. Piyush Garg, counsel for the respondent.

                                                   Dated : 02.01.2025
Hon'ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.

Present civil revision is filed by the

revisionist against the judgment and order dated

13.09.2022 passed by Judge, Small Causes

Court/Additional District Judge, Kotdwar, District

Pauri Garhwal, whereby the revisionist/tenant has

been directed to handover the possession of the

disputed property to the respondents/landlord. The

said court further directed the revisionist/tenant to

pay the outstanding rent from 01.12.2019 to

31.01.2020 @`5200/- per month and from

01.02.2020 till the date of handing over of the

peaceful actual possession to the

respondent/landlord @`2600/- per month.

2. Counsel for the respondent/landlord would

submit that on 07.10.2024, counsel for the

2025:UHC:15 revisionist/tenant has been granted time to get

instructions from his client about the time for

vacating the property in question.

3. Today, counsel for the revisionist/tenant on

instruction would submit that the revisionist/tenant

is ready and willing to handover the peaceful

possession to the respondent/landlord but at least

six months time may be granted to revisionist/tenant

for the said purposes.

4. Per contra, counsel appearing for

respondent/landlord would submit that three months

would be sufficient and reasonable for the said

purposes. He would further submit that the time of

three months be given to the revisionist/tenant on

the condition that the revisionist/tenant shall pay the

damages as directed by the trial court.

5. To this, counsel for the revisionist/tenant

would submit that the revisionist/tenant is ready to

vacate the premises within three months and also

ready to pay the damages and the rent as directed by

the trial court. He would further submit that

pursuant to the order of the Coordinate Bench dated

01.11.2022, the revisionist/tenant had deposited

2025:UHC:15 `65000/- in the Registry of this Court on 09.11.2022,

therefore, this amount be remitted to the trial court.

6. On the consent of the both the counsel for

the parties, the revisionist/tenant is given three

months time to vacate the premises in question on the

following conditions:

(i) Revisionist/tenant shall handover peaceful, vacant and actual possession to landlord- respondent, herein, on or before 03.04.2025.

(ii) Revisionist/tenant shall pay the decretal amount and damages @`2600/- along with arrears, if any, as directed by the Small Causes Court within one month from today.

(iii) Revisionist/tenant shall pay the damages by 7th day of each month of English Calendar as directed by the Small Causes Court.

(iv) An undertaking to the above effect shall be filed in the shape of affidavit by revisionist/tenant before the court concerned within two weeks.

(v) Registry of this Court shall remit the amount of `65000/-, if deposited, to the court concerned and same shall adjust @`65000/-

in payment of decretal amount, arrears of damages.

(vi) If revisionist/tenant fails to handover actual vacant physical possession to landlord on or before 03.04.2025, respondents/landlord shall be at liberty to take possession of premises in question by making application for the same in view of above in the trial court and same shall be executed straightaway.

7. In view of the above directions, the civil revision stands disposed of accordingly.

(Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.) 02.01.2025 Mamta

MA Digitally signed by MAMTA RANI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=9f3ef5e40c7881302fcda45

MTA af446d3419e6d6e990fbd25a59bdb 957bba484d0d, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=5DE1751A4F1D9CAB FD54852C9E68911CA8B66DD26690 A191648AB5D8DD004EF0,

RANI cn=MAMTA RANI Date: 2025.01.06 11:16:14 +05'30' 2025:UHC:15

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter