Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3903 UK
Judgement Date : 28 April, 2025
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 420 of 2025
Alauddin ...Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ....Respondent
Present:-
Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A. for the State.
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant seeks anticipatory bail in Case Crime
No. 759 of 2024, under Sections 3/5/11 of the Uttarakhand
Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, Police Station Kotwali
Roorkee, District Haridwar. He is a child-in-conflict with law.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and
perused the record.
3. The applicant is a child-in-conflict with law.
Therefore, in view of the judgment passed by this Court in
the case of Rashid Rao v. State of Uttarakhand, 2022 SCC
OnLine Utt 481, the anticipatory bail application is not
maintainable. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application
deserves to be rejected.
4. The anticipatory bail application is rejected.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 28.04.2025 Ravi Bisht
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!