Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3604 UK
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2025
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 979 of 2025 (M/S)
Mudit Kumar ..........Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others .......... Respondents
Present : Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Yogesh Chandra Tiwari and Mr. Sudhir Nainwal, Standing
Counsel for the State/respondent nos.1 to 4.
JUDGMENT
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The challenge in this writ petition is made to the order
dated 08.03.2002, passed in Case No.82/225 of 2001-02, Mudit
Kumar vs. State, by the court of Assistant Record Officer/Sub
Divisional Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar as well as order dated
22.05.2003, passed in Appeal No.52/100 of 2001-2002, Mudit
Kumar vs. State of Uttaranchal, by the court of Additional District
Magistrate (Nazul), Udham Singh Nagar.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
record.
3. In fact, it is admitted case of the petitioner that he had
challenged the impugned orders earlier in WPMS No.1281 of 2005,
which was dismissed on 26.09.2008.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that
prayer no.2 for regularization the land in favour of the petitioner
was not earlier, which is mandatory.
5. Be that as it may, successive petitions may not be filed
challenging the same impugned orders. Therefore, instant petition
may not be entertained. Accordingly, the writ petition deserves to
be dismissed at the stage of admission itself.
6. The petition is dismissed in limine.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 08.04.2025 Sanjay
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!