Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3510 UK
Judgement Date : 2 April, 2025
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 785 of 2025 (M/S)
Nitesh Sharma ..........Petitioner
Vs.
Sakshi Kapoor ...........Respondent
Present : Mr. Shankar Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
JUDGMENT
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Defects ignored.
2. The petitioner seeks directions for expeditious
disposal of O.S. No.980 of 2019, Nitesh Sharma vs.
Sakshi Kapoor, pending in the court of Principal Judge,
Family Court, Dehradun.
3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and
perused the record.
4. Cases may not be expedited on mere filing of a
petition. Cases are prioritized and listed according to the
pendency of cases in a particular court. Simply because
some litigant approaches this Court, a case may not be
prioritized. This is one aspect of the matter. Another
aspect of the matter is that every case needs expeditious
disposal. But then, as stated, cases are prioritized based
on the age of the cases, position of the parties, etc.
5. This Court has no doubt that the court
concerned should make endeavour to decide cases
pending in the court as expeditiously as possible, as per
priority and pendency of the cases in that court.
6. With the above observation, the writ petition
stands disposed of accordingly.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 02.04.2025 Sanjay
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!