Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Govind Ballabh Chausali vs Director And Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 2155 UK

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 2155 UK
Judgement Date : 19 September, 2024

Uttarakhand High Court

Govind Ballabh Chausali vs Director And Others on 19 September, 2024

Author: Ravindra Maithani

Bench: Ravindra Maithani

   HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

            Writ Petition No. 1768 of 2024 (S/S)
Govind Ballabh Chausali                                  ..........Petitioner

                                     Vs.

Uttarakhand Transport Corporation,

Dehradun through its Managing

Director and others                                    ..... Respondents

Present :   Mr. I.D. Paliwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
            Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate for the respondents.




                                JUDGMENT

Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

By means of the instant petition, the petitioner

seeks the following reliefs:-

i) Issue a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 27.04.2022, passed by respondent no.2 to the extent the recovery of Rs.3,65,720/- has been made from the payment of gratuity of the petitioner, pursuant to the office order no. 164 dated 11.11.2020 (contained as Annexure No.1 to this writ petition).

ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to pay the payment of gratuity after implementing the Grade Pay of Rs.4200/- which was withdrawn by the respondents pursuant

to the office order no. 164 dated 11.11.2020 along with interest @ 10% per annum as per Payment of Gratuity Act.

iii) Issue any other or further writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

iv) To award the cost of the petition in favour of the petitioner.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and

perused the record.

3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the

petitioner would submit that the matter is squarely

covered by the judgment dated 04.04.2024, passed by the

Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No.245 of

2022, Managing Director, Uttarakhand Transport

Corporation, Dehradun and others vs. Ashok Kumar

Saxena; and connected cases.

4. Learned counsel for the respondents admits

this fact.

5. Since the matter is covered, therefore, instant

petition is decided in terms of the judgment dated

04.04.2024, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in

Special Appeal No.245 of 2022, Managing Director,

Uttarakhand Transport Corporation, Dehradun and

others vs. Ashok Kumar Saxena; and connected cases.

(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 19.09.2024 Jitendra

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter