Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Kamla Devi vs State Of Uttarakhand And Three Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 2050 UK

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 2050 UK
Judgement Date : 6 September, 2024

Uttarakhand High Court

Smt. Kamla Devi vs State Of Uttarakhand And Three Others on 6 September, 2024

Author: Alok Kumar Verma

Bench: Alok Kumar Verma

                                               2024:UHC:6455

  IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
             AT NAINITAL
          THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

                  06th SEPTEMBER, 2024

          CRIMINAL REVISION NO.134 of 2015
Smt. Kamla Devi                           .....Revisionist

                         Versus

State of Uttarakhand and three Others .....Respondents


Counsel for the Revisionist       :   Mr. Prabhakar Joshi,
                                      Advocate.
Counsel for the                   :   Mr. V.K. Gemini,
Respondent No.1.                      Deputy Advocate
                                      General assisted by
                                      Mr. Rakesh Negi,
                                      Brief Holder.

Counsel for the Respondent        :   Mrs. Sarita Bisht,
Nos.2 to 4.                           Advocate holding
                                      brief of Mr. R.S.
                                      Sammal, Advocate.

                         With

          CRIMINAL REVISION NO.208 of 2015


State of Uttarakhand                      .....Revisionist

                         Versus

Deepu alias Bhupendra Rana and four Others
                                   .....Respondents

Counsel for the                   :   Mr. V.K. Gemini,
Revisionist                           Deputy Advocate
                                      General assisted by
                                      Mr. Rakesh Negi,
                                      Brief Holder.

Counsel for the Respondent        :   Mrs. Sarita Bisht,
Nos.1 to 5.                           Advocate holding
                                      brief of Mr. R.S.
                                      Sammal, Advocate.

                              1
                                                    2024:UHC:6455
Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

The case of the prosecution is that Smt.

Kamla Devi (revisionist) lodged an FIR on 09.06.2014

that she is a member of scheduled caste. Deepu Singh,

Mukesh Singh, Kallu Singh, Inder Singh and Sonu

Singh had booked her son Harish Chandra's taxi

bearing Registration No.UK01-1134 on 07.06.2014 for

the wedding ceremony. They had taken her son to

Chaukhutiya market. They had committed murder of

her son and drowned him in the river. The First

Information Report was registered against Deepu

Singh, Mukesh Singh, Inder Singh, Kallu Singh and

Sonu Singh under Section 302 of the Indian Penal

Code, 1860 (in short, "IPC") and Section 120B IPC. The

Investigating Officer had filed a charge-sheet against

the co-accused Deepu alias Bhupendra Singh and

Surendra Singh alias Sonu under Section 302 IPC,

Section 120B IPC and Section 3(2)(V) of the Scheduled

Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of

Atrocities) Act, 1989. After examining Smt. Kamla Devi

(PW1) and Shyam Lal (PW2), the prosecution had filed

an Application under Section 319 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, "Code") to

prosecute Inder Singh, Mukesh Singh and Kallu Singh

along with co-accused Deepu alias Bhupendra Singh

2024:UHC:6455 and Surendra Singh alias Sonu. The said application

has been dismissed vide impugned order dated

21.03.2015, passed by learned Special Judge/Sessions

Judge, Almora in Special Sessions Trial No.18 of 2014.

2. The Criminal Revision No.134 of 2015 will be

treated as a leading case.

3. Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, learned counsel for the

revisionist-Smt. Kamla Devi. Mr. V.K. Gemini, learned

Deputy Advocate General assisted by Mr. Rakesh Negi,

learned Brief Holder for State. Mrs. Sarita Bisht,

learned counsel holding brief of Mr. R.S. Sammal,

learned counsel for private respondents.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and

perused the record.

5. It is an admitted fact between the parties

that the accused Deepu alias Bhupendra Singh and

accused Surendra Singh alias Sonu were acquitted by

the trial court and the appeal, filed by the State,

against the acquittal has been dismissed. Hence, the

judgment of the acquittal has become final.

6. Section 319 of the Code is quoted

hereunder:-

"319. Power to proceed against other

persons appearing to be guilty of offence.-

2024:UHC:6455 (1) Where, in the course of any inquiry into, or

trial of, an offence, it appears from the evidence

that any person not being the accused has

committed any offence for which such person

could be tried together with the accused, the

Court may proceed against such person for the

offence which he appears to have committed.

(2) Where such person is not attending the Court,

he may be arrested or summoned, as the

circumstances of the case may require, for the

purpose aforesaid.

(3) Any person attending the Court although not

under arrest or upon a summons, may be

detained by such Court for the purpose of the

inquiry into, or trial of, the offence which he

appears to have committed.

(4) Where the Court proceeds against any person

under sub-section (1), then--

(a) the proceedings in respect of such person

shall be commenced afresh, and witnesses

re-heard;

(b) subject to the provisions of clause (a),

the case may proceed as if such person had

been an accused person when the Court took

2024:UHC:6455 cognizance of the offence upon which the

inquiry or trial was commenced".

7. The basic requirements for invoking Section

319 of the code is that it should appear to the Court

from the evidence collected during enquiry or trial that

some other person, who is not arraigned as an accused

in the case, had committed an offence for which that

person can be tried together with the accused already

arraigned.

8. In Sukhpal Singh Khaira Vs. State of

Punjab, (2023) 1 SCC 289, the Hon'ble Supreme

Court has held that the power under Section 319 of the

Code is to be invoked and exercised before the

pronouncement of the order of sentence where there is

a judgment of conviction of the accused. In the case of

acquittal, the power should be exercised before the

order of acquittal is pronounced. Hence, the

summoning order has to precede the conclusion of trial

by imposition of sentence in the case of conviction. If

the order is passed on the same day, it will have to be

examined on the facts and circumstances of each case

and if such summoning order is passed either after the

order of acquittal or imposing sentence in the case of

conviction, the same will not be sustainable.

9. In view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble

2024:UHC:6455 Supreme Court in Sukhpal Singh Khaira (Supra),

these Revisions are liable to be dismissed; the same

are dismissed.

10. A copy of this judgment be placed on the

record of the connected Criminal Revision No.208 of

2015.

___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.

Dt:06.09.2024

NEHA

DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND,

2.5.4.20=6f1c15b6305912b3f008e9a4a8038ee7326 b08b2d0e018b01be753f014836d27,

BISHT postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=3D89DC33779FB9677068452F32DE6 BA960BFE64D819EE44CA9CCE487B2FE0F92, cn=NEHA BISHT Date: 2024.09.10 17:33:29 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter