Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Virendra Singh Bisht Alias Vishnu vs State Of Uttarakhand
2024 Latest Caselaw 2547 UK

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 2547 UK
Judgement Date : 6 November, 2024

Uttarakhand High Court

Virendra Singh Bisht Alias Vishnu vs State Of Uttarakhand on 6 November, 2024

Author: Ravindra Maithani

Bench: Ravindra Maithani

 HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
          First Bail Application No. 2095 of 2023

 Virendra Singh Bisht Alias Vishnu                 ........Applicant

                                 Versus

 State of Uttarakhand                             ........Respondent
 Present:-
       Mr. B.S. Adhikari, learned Amicus Curiae.
       Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, A.G.A. for the State.

 Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

Delay in filing counter affidavit is condoned.

Counter affidavit is taken on record. Delay Condonation

Application, IA No.2 of 2024, stands disposed of,

accordingly.

2. Applicant is in judicial custody arising out of

Sessions Trial No.126 of 2020, in Case Crime No.40 of 2020,

under Sections 302, 392, 411 IPC, Police Station- Kankhal,

District- Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.

3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and

perused the record.

4. On 13.02.2020, the deceased Asha Rani was

found unconscious in her house. Her son, the informant,

was informed, who took the deceased to hospital, where she

was declared brought dead. The informant could realise that

the mobile phone of the deceased was missing.

Subsequently, it was revealed that many articles from the

house were also found missing. A report was lodged.

5. According to the prosecution case, on

19.02.2020, the applicant was apprehended and at his

instance, looted jewellery and a piece of bed sheet, by which

he killed the deceased, were also recovered from his house at

Delhi. It is also the prosecution case that the informant

identified the applicant in the CCTV footages based on his

body movement, as his face was not visible. It is further the

case of the prosecution that, in fact, the applicant was once

the tenant of the informant.

6. Learned counsel for the applicant would argue

that there are only two pieces of evidence against the

applicant; one is the CCTV footage, in which the applicant is

not identifiable by his face, but the informant tells it to the

Investigating Officer that by the body movement, the person

appears to be the applicant; the another piece of evidence is

the alleged recovery from the home of the applicant at Delhi,

but he would submit that the piece of bed sheet was never

sent to forensic, so as to connect the applicant with the

killing of the deceased.

7. Learned State Counsel fairly concedes that in the

CCTV footage, as per the prosecution, the face of the

applicant is not visible, but the informant could identify the

applicant by his body movement. She would submit that

certain articles were recovered at the instance of the

applicant and the articles were identified, as those belonging

to the deceased. She admits that that the bed sheet was

never sent for forensic examination.

8. It is a stage of bail. Much of the discussion is not

expected of. Arguments are being appreciated with the

caveat that any observation made in this order shall have no

bearing at any subsequent stage of the trial, or in any other

proceeding.

9. It is a case based on circumstantial evidence.

Admittedly, in the CCTV footage, the applicant has not been

identified. Merely, it is stated that based on the body

movement, the informant could tell that it was the applicant,

who was leaving his house. There is alleged recovery from

the home of the applicant on 19.02.2020. How the piece of

bed sheet, which was allegedly used in the offence, may be

connected with the offence? This and many more questions

would find answer during trial.

10. Having considered, this Court is of the view that

it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be

enlarged on bail.

11. The bail application is allowed.

12. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his

executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable

sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the

court concerned.

13. Let a copy of this judgment be forwarded to the

concerned jail for compliance.

(Ravindra Maithani, J) 06.11.2024 Ravi Bisht

RAVI

2.5.4.20=ded921477e34a304cbcb0b 52d4a59f37e6d2018d38d0b669a5c0 68799391e6bb, postalCode=263001,

BISHT st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AA64B1F44E60E652A E5485ED764961E4E52FD29C6F03C2 0917020ED093405536, cn=RAVI BISHT Date: 2024.11.06 16:56:35 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter