Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1289 UK
Judgement Date : 2 July, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MS. RITU BAHRI
AND
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH THAPLIYAL
WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 139 OF 2024
2ND JULY, 2024
Rajni Rautela ...... Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & others ...... Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. Abhhishek Sati, learned
counsel
Counsel for the respondent : Mr. K.N. Joshi, learned Deputy
Advocate General with Ms. Rajni
Supyal Latwal, learned Brief Holder
for the State
: Mr. Ashish Joshi, learned counsel
for respondent No. 2
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:
(per Hon'ble The Chief Justice Ms. Ritu Bahri)
Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are the borrowers, in
the present case, and they had taken the loan. The
petitioner had sold the property to respondent Nos. 3
and 4, and there is no other property available with
respondent Nos. 3 and 4 as per counsel for the bank,
and the loan of rupees thirty lakhs has been taken by
respondent Nos. 3 and 4.
2) Since the issue involved is only with respect to
this property, this petition is being disposed of by giving
liberty to the petitioner to approach the Debt Recovery
Tribunal under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.
3) Counsel for the bank has informed that there
is already a Securitization Application No. 81 of 2022,
pending before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Dehradun.
4) The writ petition stands disposed of
accordingly.
5) Interim relief application (IA No. 01 of 2024)
also stands disposed of.
_______________ RITU BAHRI, C.J.
________________ RAKESH THAPLIYAL, J.
Dt: 2ND JULY, 2024 Negi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!