Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 91 UK
Judgement Date : 16 February, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MS. RITU BAHRI
ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 73 OF 2023
16TH FEBRUARY, 2024
Suresh Kumar Tyagi ...... Applicant/Petitioner
Versus
Secretary, District Level
Development Authority & another ...... Respondents
Counsel for the applicant : Ms. Seema Sah, learned counsel
Counsel for the respondents : Ms. Abhilasha Tomar, learned
counsel holding brief of Mr.
Sandeep Kothari, learned
counsel
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:
Counsel for the applicant / petitioner states
that clause 31, at page 52 (Annexure-2), is part of
contract agreement between the parties which stipulates
that in case of any dispute arising between the parties,
which has not been settled amicable, any party can refer
the dispute for arbitration under the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996.
2) This arbitration petition is of the year 2023.
No reply / counter-affidavit has been filed till date.
3) Learned counsel for the respondents do not
dispute the factum of the applicant being awarded the
contract in question, as also the factum of the arbitration
agreement contained in the contract agreement. It is
also not disputed that disputes have arisen between the
parties which are referable to Arbitrator.
4) Keeping in view this fact, I proceed to appoint
Mr. Justice V.K. Bist, (Retd.) Chief Justice, Sikkim High
Court as the sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes
which have arisen between the parties under the
aforesaid agreement.
5) The Arbitration application stands disposed of
accordingly.
______________ RITU BAHRI, C.J.
Dt: 16th FEBRUARY, 2024 Negi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!