Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 187 UK
Judgement Date : 28 February, 2024
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT
NAINITAL
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MS. RITU BAHRI
AND
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SRI RAKESH THAPLIYAL
28th February, 2024
First Appeal No. 162 of 2022
Raj Kapoor ........Appellant
Versus
Sarika Tandon ........Respondent
Counsel for the appellant : Mr. B.D. Kandpal, learned counsel
Counsel for the respondent : Mr. Udyog Shukla, learned counsel
Judgment: (per Ms. Ritu Bahri, C.J.)
The applicant has moved this Application
(MCC/1/2023) for recalling the order dated 28.06.2023,
whereby the Appeal filed by the appellant-husband has
been allowed.
2. Perusal of judgment dated 28.06.2023, passed by
this Court shows that when this Appeal was allowed,
none had appeared for the respondent. As per the report
of the Registry dated 21.10.2022, the respondent had
been personally served. Even before the Family Court,
as per the judgment of the Family Court in para 3, it has
been observed that the notice was issued to the
applicant Smt. Sarika Tandon and she was served and
after service, she did not put in appearance.
2
3. Since the applicant did not chose to appear in both
the proceedings, no ground is made out to recall the
order dated 28.06.2023, the Recall Application is being
dismissed.
___________________________
Ritu Bahri, C.J.
___________________________ Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Dt: 28th February, 2024 M/K
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!