Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

CLR/59/2023
2023 Latest Caselaw 3243 UK

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3243 UK
Judgement Date : 19 October, 2023

Uttarakhand High Court
CLR/59/2023 on 19 October, 2023
             Office Notes,
                reports,
               orders or
             proceedings
SL.
      Date   or directions                         COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No
                  and
              Registrar's
              order with
              Signatures
                             CLR NO. 59 of 2023
                             Hon'ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.

Mr. Piyush Garg, counsel for the revisionists. Mr. Vikas Bahuguna, counsel for the respondents.

2. Counsel for the revisionists/tenants would submit that the respondent/landlord had instituted SCC Suit No. 13 of 2016 against the revisionist/tenant for non-payment of rent; that, the counsel for the revisionists/tenants moved an application before the court below that he wants to withdraw his vakalatnama as he is not able to bring justice to revisionists; that, thereafter the case proceeded ex-parte and order of eviction against the revisionists/tenants was passed; that, thereafter an application for setting aside the said ex- parte order has been moved by the revisionists/tenants, which was also dismissed by District Judge/Judge, S.C.C., Pauri Garhwal vide impugned order dated 24.03.2023. Hence, the present revision.

3. Counsel for the respondent/landlord would submit that the Judge, SCC, Pauri Garhwal had specifically made the findings in the impugned order dated 24.03.2022 that apart from the counsel who withdrew himself from the case of the revisionists/tenants there was the vakalanama of another counsel Mr. Kuldeep Jakhetiya also on record; that, non- appearance of an Advocate on behalf of the revisionists/tenants is not a valid ground for setting aside the impugned order.

He would further submit if this ground is accepted, every ex-parte judgment/order/decree could be set aside for non-appearance of counsel then no ex-parte judgment/order/decree can be passed and it will always prone to be set aside by moving the application under Order 9 Rule 13 C.P.C.

4. At this stage, counsel for the parties seek and is granted time to place law in support of their respective case.

5. Counsel for the parties are directed to exchange the list of case law with each other before three days of listing of the case and also furnish the copy to this Court.

6. Put up on 03.01.2024.

(Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.) 19.10.2023 Mamta

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter