Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3484 UK
Judgement Date : 30 November, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PANKAJ PUROHIT
WRIT PETITION (M/B) NO. 247 OF 2023
30TH NOVEMBER, 2023
Ravindra Pratap Singh ...... Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & others ...... Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Chaturvedi, learned
counsel
Counsel for the respondents : Mr. P.C. Bisht, learned Additional
Chief Standing Counsel for the
State
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:
(per Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice Sri Manoj Kumar Tiwari)
On 11.05.2022, petitioner was granted
permission to remove river bed material under dredging
policy by the State. As per conditions of the permission,
he was required to remove the river bed material upto
30.06.2022. Petitioner could not remove the entire
quantity of river bed material within the given time.
Thus, the said permission granted to him expired on
30.06.2022. Now, the Director, Mining and Geological
Directorate, Dehradun has invited bids for award of
contract of removing river bed material from the river,
for which petitioner was earlier granted permission. In
this writ petition, petitioner has challenged said tender
notice.
2) By means of this writ petition, petitioner has
sought the following substantial reliefs :
i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the Office Memorandum dated 22.08.2023, along with tender notice dated 29.08.2023 (Annexure-1) to the extent of Village Chamoli Sain, Tehsil Satpuli, and District Pauri of Khasra No. 841.
ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned recovery notice dated 08.02.2023 (Annexure-2) / recovery certificate dated 06.07.2023 (Annexure-3).
iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No. 2 to consider the extension of time pursuant to the RBM mining permission dated 11.05.2022 (Annexure-5) in compliance of GO No. 1109 dated 30.11.2022 (Annexure-9)."
3) Learned State counsel points out that similar
controversy was decided by this Court in Writ Petition
(M/B) No. 246 of 2023.
4) Mr. Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the
petitioner, does not dispute the said submission, and
submits that the present writ petition may be decided in
terms of judgment dated 29.09.2023, rendered in Writ
Petition (M/B) No. 246 of 2023.
5) We, accordingly, dispose of the writ petition in
terms of judgment dated 29.09.2023, and direct the
Commissioner, Garhwal Division to make an endeavour
to decide the appeal filed by the petitioner against
recovery citation within six weeks from the date of
production of certified copy of this order.
6) Interim Relief Application (IA No. 01 of 2023)
also stands disposed of.
__________________________ MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, A.C.J.
_______________ PANKAJ PUROHIT, J.
Dt: 30TH NOVEMBER, 2023 Negi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!