Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 852 UK
Judgement Date : 28 March, 2023
Office Notes,
reports, orders or
SL. proceedings or
Date COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No directions and
Registrar's order
with Signatures
CRLR No.156 of 2017
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J.
Mr. M.S. Bisht, Advocate for the revisionist.
None appears for the respondent. Instant revision was preferred against the judgment and order dated 24.03.2017, passed in Misc. Case No.50 of 2015, Smt. Anita Dabral vs. Pramod Dabral, by the court of Additional Judge, Family Court, Rishikesh, District Dehradun, by which an application filed by the revisionist under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. was dismissed. The revision was allowed on 09.04.2019.
Now, a correction application has been filed.
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the revisionist would submit that, in fact, in the order dated 09.04.2019, the Court had used the word 'interim maintenance' instead of 'maintenance'. It is argued that in para 12 under directions also, this inadvertent error has been done.
Correction application is allowed. The word 'interim' as appeared in para 12 of the judgment dated 09.04.2019 is deleted, accordingly.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 28.03.2023
AK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!