Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 839 UK
Judgement Date : 27 March, 2023
Office Notes,
reports, orders
SL. or proceedings
Date COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No or directions and
Registrar's order
with Signatures
WPMS No. 70 of 2012
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
None present for the petitioner. Mr. Yogesh Pandey, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand.
Mr. Prakeep Kumar Chauhan, learned counsel for respondent no. 2. - applicant.
This writ petition was decided vide judgment dated 24.08.2021. While deciding writ petition, this Court provided that the amount deposited by petitioner, in terms of order dated 17.01.2012, shall be released in his favour.
Today, the matter is listed on miscellaneous application filed by respondent no. 2 - workmen, whereby he has prayed that the amount deposited in the Registry of this Court, pursuant to order dated 17.01.2012, be directed to be forwarded to the Executing Court.
Since in the judgment itself, it is provided that the amount shall be released in favour of petitioner, therefore, there is no question of issuing any further direction, as sought by respondent workmen.
Accordingly, miscellaneous application (MCC No. 1942 of 2022) is rejected.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 27.03.2023 Aswal
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!