Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 734 UK
Judgement Date : 21 March, 2023
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No
and Registrar's
order with
Signatures
21.03.2023 AO No. 111 of 2023
Sri Vipin Sanghi, C.J.
Sri Alok Kumar Verma, J.
Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, learned counsel for the appellant.
The present Appeal is directed against the order
dated 28.02.2023 passed by the learned Judge, Family
Court, Vikasnagar, District Dehradun. The impugned order
reads as follows :-
The appellant-father has preferred the custody
petition in respect of the two minor children, and has also
sought visitation rights. It appears that the respondent
was ex parte, and did not participate in the proceedings,
despite service through publication. Consequently, the
Judge, Family Court proceeded to hear the Custody
Petition finally, and reserved judgment.
From the impugned order, it transpires that the
learned Judge felt it necessary to first interact with the two minor children aged 14 years and 8 years, and,
consequently, fixed the proceedings on 22.03.2023 for
production of the two children before the Court.
The grievance of the appellant is that he has not met
his two children for the last ten months, and the learned
Judge, Family Court should have at least decided his
visitation rights application urgently.
We dispose of this Appeal, leaving it open to the
appellant to press his application for visitation rights in
respect of the two minor children on the date fixed by the
Judge, Family Court, i.e. 22.03.2023.
The Appeal is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
Consequently, pending applications, if any, stand
disposed of.
(Alok Kumar Verma, J.) (Vipin Sanghi, C.J.)
21.03.2023 21.03.2023
Rahul
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!