Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 606 UK
Judgement Date : 13 March, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI VIPIN SANGHI
WRIT PETITION (M/S) NO. 143 OF 2023
13TH MARCH, 2023
Between:
Mantri / Secretary, Khestriya Shri
Gandhi Ashram, Gauchar, District
Chamoli ...... Petitioner
and
Labour Commissioner & another ...... Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. Prashant Khanna, learned
counsel
Counsel for the respondent : Mr. Tej Singh Bisht, learned Deputy
Advocate General with Mr. Yogesh
Chandra Tiwari, Standing Counsel and
Mr. M.S. Bisht, Brief Holder for the
State / respondent No. 1
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:
The present petition has been preferred, under
Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to assail the ex-
parte Award dated 16.02.2022, passed by the learned
Labour Court, Dehradun, in Adjudication Case No. 01 of
2020, as well as the order of publication dated
04.03.2022, passed by learned Labour Commissioner,
Haldwani, in pursuance of the aforesaid Award.
2) The case of the petitioner / employer is that,
the petitioner never appeared before the Labour Court
despite issuance of notice, on account of the "Covid
Situation". A perusal of the order-sheet of the Labour
Court show that on 28.02.2020, the petitioner did not
appear, despite issuance of notice by registered post.
Consequently, the Labour Court treated the petitioner /
employer as served, and granted time to file the written
statement. The matter was adjourned to 13.04.2020.
3) The petitioner did not appear either on
13.04.2020, or even thereafter on 08.05.2020,
03.06.2020, 23.07,2020, 05.09.2020, 09.10.2020,
06.11.2020, 07.12.2020, 11.01.2021, 05.02.2021,
04.03.2021, 01.042021, 30.04.2021, 08.06.2021,
15.07.2021, 23.08.2021, 30.09.2021, 17.11.2021,
30.11.2021, 04.01.2022, 31.01.2022, 11.02.2022 and
16.02.2022, when the matter was heard ex-parte, and
reserved for Award. The aforesaid dates show that the
said period covers the time when the Covid pandemic
were prevalent, but also other period when Covid
pandemic has receded, and near normalcy had been
restored.
4) I am, therefore, not convinced that the
petitioner had sufficient cause of non-appearance before
the Labour Court for such a long period of time.
5) I am, therefore, not inclined to interfere with
the impugned Award. The petitioner is, accordingly,
dismissed.
________________ VIPIN SANGHI, C.J.
Dt: 13th MARCH, 2023 Negi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!