Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 308 UK
Judgement Date : 20 January, 2023
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Criminal Writ Petition No. 139 of 2023
Kuldeep Bhardwaz ........Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & others ........Respondents
Present:-
Mr. Bilal Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Lalit Miglani, A.G.A. along with Ms. Sangeeta Bhardwaj,
Brief Holder for the State.
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The instant petition has been filed seeking
protection from respondent nos. 3 to 6, on the ground
that the petitioner had lodged an FIR No.270 of 2018,
under Sections 420, 323, 504 & 307 IPC, Police Station
Manglore, District Haridwar against respondent nos. 3 to
6, therefore, they are extending threats to the petitioner.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and
perused the record. Learned counsel for the petitioner
appeared through video conferencing.
3. According to the petitioner's case, he is a
witness in the FIR. If any threat is being extended to the
petitioner, he can very well file an application under the
Witness Protection Scheme, as promulgated, pursuant to
the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Mahender Chawla & others vs. Union of India & others,
(2019) 14 SCC 615.
4. With these observations, the instant writ
petition stands disposed of.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) Vacation Judge 20.01.2023 AK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!