Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 298 UK
Judgement Date : 17 January, 2023
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No.2005 of 2022
Himanshu Kashyap @ Jassi ........Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ........Respondent
With
First Bail Application No.1873 of 2022
Sanjay Chauhan ........Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ........Respondent
With
First Bail Application No.2004 of 2022
Vivek Pargai ........Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ........Respondent
Present:-
Mr. Vikas Anand and Ms. Manju Bahuguna, Advocates for
the applicants.
Mr. Lalit Miglani, A.G.A. along with Ms. Mamta Joshi, Brief
Holder for the State.
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Since, all the above bail applications arise from
the same FIR, these are being decided together by this
common judgment.
2. Applicants Himanshu Kashyap @ Jassi, Sanjay
Chauhan and Vivek Pargai are in judicial custody in
FIR/Case Crime No.195 of 2022, under Sections 147,
148, 149, 323, 307, 341, 504 and 506 IPC, Police Station
Transit Camp, District Udham Singh Nagar. They have
sought their release on bail.
3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and
perused the record.
4. It is argued that the co-accused having similar
role have already been granted bail.
4. This fact is not disputed by the learned State
counsel.
5. Having considered, this Court is of the view
that it is a case fit for bail and the applicants deserve to
be enlarged on bail.
6. The bail applications are allowed.
7. Let the applicants be released on bail, on
executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable
sureties by each one of them, each of the like amount, to
the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) Vacation Judge 17.01.2023 Sukhbant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!