Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2095 UK
Judgement Date : 4 August, 2023
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2179 of 2023
Aadi Sehal ...Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others ...Respondents
Present:-
Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. B.D. Bisen, Brief Holder for the State.
JUDGMENT
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) The challenge in this petition is made to an order
dated 24.02.2023 by which, the caste certificate has been
declined to the petitioner.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused
the record.
3. At the very outset, learned State counsel would
submit that an appeal is provided in such matters. The first
appeal may be preferred before the Sub Divisional Magistrate
and second appeal before the District Magistrate by virtue of
notification dated 20.05.2022 issued by Department of
Personnel and Vigilance-VI of the State of Uttarakhand.
4. The notification has been placed for perusal of the
Court and factor with regard to the time limit within which
these appeals may be decided, the first appeal in such
matter, according to this notification may be preferred before
the Sub Divisional Magistrate and second appeal before the
District Magistrate.
5. Since the procedure has been prescribed in such
matters, there is no reason to entertain the petition.
Accordingly, the petitioner deserves to be dismissed at the
stage of admission itself.
6. The writ petition is dismissed in limine.
7. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the
impugned order, by which caste certificate was declined
before the appellate authority. This Court has no doubt that
if such appeal is preferred, it shall be decided within the
stipulated time as given in the notification, as referred to
hereinabove.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 04.08.2023 Jitendra
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!