Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1179 UK
Judgement Date : 28 April, 2023
Office Notes,
reports, orders or
proceedings or
Sl. No Date COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
directions and
Registrar's order
with Signatures
C482 No.904 of 2022
Hon'ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
Mr. P.C. Pethshali, Advocate, for the applicants.
Mrs. Mamta Joshi, Brief Holder, for the State of Uttarakhand/1.
Mr. S.R.S. Gill, Advocate, for the respondent no.2.
On the complaint proceedings by way of the Complaint Case No.390 of 2020, "Dinesh Chandra Anil Kumar Vs. Soban Singh and another", stood instituted before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Almora, for trying the present applicants for the offences under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
In those proceedings, an application under section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, was filed whereby the present applicants have proclaimed himself to have compounded the offence by remitting the amount, which was due to be paid under the notices issued under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The said application has been rejected. Consequently, the present C482 application.
In the proceedings of this C482 application, when it was taken up before this court on 20th December 2022, once again a similar expression was given by the applicants that they are ready to settle the amount by way of a conciliation, but when the effort for conciliation was made by the respondent for remittance of the amount in accordance with the parameters laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the judgement reported in 2018 SCC Criminal 477, "M/s Meters and Instruments Private Limited and another Vs. Kanchan Mehta", the conciliation was not signed by the applicants, and as a consequence thereto the settled amount which was agreed to be paid by the applicants in pursuance to the order dated 20th December, 2022, could not be paid.
In that eventuality, the liberty which is being attempted to be sought by the applicants to permit them to file a fresh application under section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, was, in fact, nothing but a clever device to buy time for ensuring non remittance of the amount due to be paid to the respondents as payable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Without venturing into the merits of the C482 application, the matter is remitted back to the learned Trial Court to determine the total amount payable, as per the guidelines framed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in paragraph no.20, of the judgment, and would determine the total amount payable to the respondents within a period of one month from today, and within a period of two weeks thereafter, the applicants would ensure to remit the amount as to be determined by the learned trial court, and it is made clear that there would be no preponderances or an interpretation of the probabilities of the amount to be paid. Whatsoever the amount is determined by the trial court in the light of the judgement of "M/s Meters and Instruments Private Limited and another Vs. Kanchan Mehta" is being ensured to be paid to the respondents by the learned counsel for the present applicants.
In that view of the matter, without interfering in the C482 application on merits, the same is being disposed of directing the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Almora, to determine the total amount payable under the Negotiable Instruments Act, to the respondents within a period of six weeks from today, and then only would the proceedings of 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, be considered.
Subject to the aforesaid, the C482 application is hereby dismissed.
(Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.) 28.04.2023 NR/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!