Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3119 UK
Judgement Date : 23 September, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI VIPIN SANGHI
AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.C. KHULBE
23rd SEPTEMBER, 2022
WRIT PETITION (S/B) No. 400 OF 2017
Between:
Nirmala Mehra ..Petitioner.
and
State of Uttarakhand and others. .....Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. Syed Kashif Jafri, learned proxy
counsel for Mr. Alok Dalakoti, learned
counsel for the petitioner.
Counsel for the respondents : Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, learned Brief
Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
JUDGMENT : (per Sri Vipin Sanghi, C.J.)
Mr. Syed Kashif Jafri, learned proxy counsel
for Mr. Alok Dalakoti, learned counsel for the petitioner,
submits that the writ petition has become infructuous
with the passage of time.
2. The writ petition is dismissed as such.
3. In sequel thereto, pending application, if any,
also stands dismissed.
________________
VIPIN SANGHI, C.J.
_____________
R.C. KHULBE, J.
Dt: 23rd September, 2022 Rathour
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!