Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2911 UK
Judgement Date : 9 September, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI VIPIN SANGHI
AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI
9TH SEPTEMBER, 2022
WRIT PETITION (S/B) No. 21 OF 2022
Between:
Brij Bihari Sharma. ...Petitioner
and
State of Uttarakhand and others ...Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner. : Mr. Bhagwat Mehra, the learned counsel.
Counsel for the respondents : Mr. S. S. Chaudhary, the learned Brief Holder for
the State of Uttarakhand.
JUDGMENT : (per Sri Vipin Sanghi, C.J.)
The petitioner has preferred the present writ
petition to assail his suspension vide order dated 25.10.2021.
The petitioner was suspended in contemplation of an enquiry.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the
enquiry has been concluded, and the petitioner has made his
representation, in response to the enquiry report, on
18.07.2022. The Disciplinary Authority has, however, not
passed the final order. In the meantime, the petitioner has
superannuated on 31.07.2022.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also states that
the petitioner's subsistence allowance for five months is
outstanding. If that be the case, respondents should look
into the matter and pay the outstanding subsistence
allowance to the petitioner within six weeks.
4. In the light of the aforesaid, this writ petition has
become infructuous and is disposed of as such.
1
5. The respondents shall endeavour to pass the final
order in the next four weeks.
6. In sequel thereto, all pending applications stand
disposed of.
___________________
VIPIN SANGHI, C. J.
______________
MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, J.
Dt: 09.09.2022 Aswal/NT
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!