Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1473 UK
Judgement Date : 12 May, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI SANJAYA KUMAR MISHRA
AND
JUSTICE SHRI RAMESH CHANDRA KHULBE
WRIT PETITION (M/S) NO. 1003 OF 2022
12th MAY, 2022
Between:
M/s Sara Eminent
(through its Authorised Signatory)
...... Petitioner
And
The Union of India & others ...... Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. Pulak Raj Mullick, learned
counsel
Counsel for respondent Nos. 2 to 4 : Mr. Shobhit Saharia, learned
counsel
Upon hearing the learned Counsel, the Court made
the following
JUDGMENT: (per the Acting Chief Justice Shri Sanjaya Kumar Mishra)
Heard Mr. Pullak Raj Mullick, the learned
counsel for the petitioner at length.
2) The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to
withdraw the writ petition, but with a liberty to raise all
the issues raised in the writ petition before the Appellate
Authority under the Statute, except the question of vires
2
of Section 174 of the Central Goods and Services Tax
Act, 2017.
3) In case, an appeal is preferred, and the
petitioner raises all these questions, except the question
of vires, it shall be expedient and proper on the part of
the Appellate Court / Authority to take into consideration
the argument made by the petitioner before it, and to
decide the same as per law.
4) We make it clear that we have not expressed
our opinion on merits of any of the claims of the
petitioner relating to the legality and propriety of the
order impugned as well as on the question of limitation.
5) The writ petition stands dismissed as
withdrawn, accordingly.
___________________________
SANJAYA KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J.
______________________
RAMESH CHANDRA KHULBE, J.
Dated: 12th MAY, 2022 Negi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!