Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1434 UK
Judgement Date : 9 May, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI SANJAYA KUMAR MISHRA
AND
JUSTICE SRI RAMESH CHANDRA KHULBE
WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 827 OF 2022
09th MAY, 2022
Between:
Mustakeem ...... Petitioner
and
State of Uttarakhand and others ...... Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. B.D. Pande and Mr. Shakti
Singh, learned counsel
Counsel for respondent State : Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Deputy
Advocate General with Mr. Rakesh
Kumar Joshi, learned Brief Holder
for the State / respondent Nos. 1
to 3
Counsel for respondent Nos. 4 to 9 : Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, learned counsel
Upon hearing the learned Counsel, the Court made the
following
JUDGMENT: (per the Acting Chief Justice Shri Sanjaya Kumar Mishra)
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2) There is a complete suppression of the fact
that the petitioner has already approached the Civil
Judge (Junior Division), Kashipur, District Udham Singh
2
Nagar, by filing a civil suit, and also an application for
interim injunction.
3) Since the petitioner has already approached
the Civil Court for appropriate relief, and has suppressed
this fact before us, we are not inclined to entertain the
writ petition.
4) The Criminal Writ Petition is dismissed.
5) However, at the request of learned counsel for
the petitioner, the Civil Judge, Kashipur, is directed to
dispose of the application for interim injunction within a
period of seven days from the date of production of
certified copy of this Order.
___________________________
SANJAYA KUMAR MISHRA, A.C.J.
_____________________
RAMESH CHANDRA KHULBE, J.
Dt: 09th MAY, 2022 Negi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!