Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2317 UK
Judgement Date : 27 July, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT
NAINITAL
THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI VIPIN SANGHI
AND
JUSTICE SHRI RAMESH CHANDRA KHULBE
WPCRL No.1449 OF 2022
27TH JULY, 2022
Monika ...... Petitioner
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand and others ...... Respondents
Presence: -
Shri Mukesh Rawat, learned counsel holding brief of Mr.
Susheel Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri J.S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General for the
State.
JUDGMENT: (Per Shri Vipin Sanghi, Chief Justice)
The petitioner, who is above the age of 18
years, has preferred this petition to seek direction to
respondent nos.2 and 3 for providing adequate security to
the life and liberty of the petitioner from respondent nos.4
and 5, who are her mother and father respectively. The
petitioner is in Court and she states that she is residing
with her parent, however, they are bent upon getting her
married to a person whom she is not interested in
marrying.
2. In this background, she apprehends threat to
her life and person at the hands of respondent nos.4 and
5. She also apprehends that her parent would get her
married forcibly to someone she is not interested in
getting married to.
3. We have heard the learned counsel for the
petitioner as well as Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Deputy
Advocate General for the State/ respondents.
4. Since, the petitioner appears to be a major as is
evident from her Adhaar Card which depicts her date of
birth as 15.03.2004 as also from Scholar's Register &
Transfer Certificate Form issued by the Principal of the
School where the petitioner appears to have studied, she
is entitled to take her own decisions and she cannot be
compelled to marry a person whom she is not willing to
marry.
5. We, therefore, direct respondent no.3 - S.H.O.
Police Station Kankhal, District Haridwar through
respondent no.2 - Senior Superintendent of Police,
Haridwar, to ensure that firstly, no harm is caused to the
petitioner from respondent nos.4 and 5 and secondly,
there is no coercive pressure on her by respondent no.4
and 5 to get her married to a person whom she is not
interested to marry.
6. The Writ Petition is, hereby, disposed of.
2
7. Let a free copy of this order be immediately
handed over to Mr. J.S. Virk, the learned Deputy
Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand, for early
compliance.
8. In sequel thereto, all pending applications stand
disposed of.
9. Urgent copy of this order be supplied to the
learned counsel for the parties during the course of the
day, as per Rules.
________________
VIPIN SANGHI, C.J.
________________________
RAMESH CHANDRA KHULBE, J.
Dated: 27th July, 2022 BS/SS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!