Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2150 UK
Judgement Date : 18 July, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI VIPIN SANGHI
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDRA KHULBE
WRIT PETITION (M/S) NO. 1617 OF 2022
18th JULY, 2022
Between:
Nanhe Khan and others ...... Petitioners
and
State of Uttarakhand & others ...... Respondents
Counsel for the petitioners : Mr. T.A. Khan, learned Senior
Counsel assisted by Mr. Vinay
Bhatt, learned counsel
Counsel for the respondents : Mr. K.N. Joshi, learned Deputy
Advocate General for the State of
Uttarakhand / respondent Nos. 1
to 6
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT: (per Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sri Vipin Sanghi)
The petitioners have preferred the present writ
petition to seek quashing of the notice dated 25.06.2022
issued to the petitioners alleging that the petitioners are
encroaching on a government land situated in Khasra
No. 162-kha of Village Rajpur, Tehsil Jaspur, District
Udham Singh Nagar. This show cause notice was given
2
by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Jaspur, in pursuance of
the order passed by this Court in Writ Petition (PIL) Nos.
65 of 2011 and 29 of 2016.
2) We have heard the learned counsel.
3) The grievance of the petitioners is that while
issuing notice dated 25.06.2022, the respondents have
required the petitioners to vacate the premises within
seven days. The same is not in accordance with the
principles of natural justice, or even the order passed by
the Division Bench, which required issuance of a show
cause notice and a brief hearing to the notice.
4) According to the petitioners, the land in
question is situated in Khasra No. 162-ka of Village
Rajpur, Tehsil Jaspur, District Udham Singh Nagar.
5) We dispose of this petition by granting liberty
to the petitioners to respond to the show cause notice
within next ten days. The SDM shall fix a date for
hearing, and after hearing the petitioners, shall pass a
reasoned order. In case, the petitioners are aggrieved
by the reasoned order that may be passed, the
petitioners may avail of their remedies. Till the order is
passed, no action shall be taken to evict the petitioners.
3
6) In sequel thereto, pending application, if any,
also stands disposed of.
________________
VIPIN SANGHI, C.J.
__________
R.C. Khulbe, J.
Dt: 18th JULY, 2022 Negi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!